A+ A A-

6. Triple H

Rate this item
(2 votes)
Triple H
Triple H takes a lot of heat for marrying Vince McMahon’s daughter. Many have stated that his success in the largest wrestling federation is attributed to that. Many of his peers however have gone constantly on record that few have ever worked harder to achieve the success that he did, and despite the criticism he has received, Triple H has proven to be a very good professional wrestler.


After Triple H’s last match with the Undertaker at Wrestlemania 28, Jim Ross proclaimed it an “end of an era”. Although “The Game” is still in excellent shape and could maintain a regular schedule, it is apparent that he will now be a special attraction and move on to a more behind the scenes role. It may be a loss for wrestling fans, but honestly, did he have anything left to prove?

Triple H won every title in the WWE worth winning, had matches of the year, and when he wanted to make fans laugh, could do so with the greatest of ease. He was also equally successful as one of the most dastardly heels in WWE history. Regardless of who he married, Triple H had a Hall of Fame Career. We are just curious what year it will happen.



The Bullet Points:


Other Aliases:
Jean Paul Levesque
Hunter Hearst Helmsley
The Game
The King of Kings

Billed From:
U.S.A. (Greenwich, CT)                      

Key Championships Held:
WWF Intercontinental (4)
WWF European (2)
WWF/E World Championship (8)
WWE World Heavyweight (5)
WWE World Tag Team (2) 1w/ Steve Austin 1w/Shawn Michaels
King of the Ring (1997)
Royal Rumble (2002)

Why He Will Get In:
The connections, the resume, the ability.

Why He Won’t Get In:
He may wish to avoid the allegations of nepotism.

Five Greatest Matches/Moments: (In Chronological Order)
1. Won the King of the Ring (6/9/97)
2. Defeated Mankind to win the World Title for the first time (8/23/99)
3. Retired Mick Foley in a Brutal Hell in a Cell Match (2/27/00)
4. Loses three consecutive high quality PPV matches to Dave Batista, proving he can make a major star in the process (2005)
5. Loses to the Undertaker at Wrestlemania 27, yet steals the show (4/3/11)

Should they be in the Hall of Fame?

(You must be registered and logged in to vote!)
Definitely put them in! - 71.4%
Maybe, but others deserve it first. - 14.3%
Probably not, but it wouldn't be the end of the world. - 14.3%
No opinion. - 0%
No way! - 0%

Last modified on Saturday, 12 April 2014 14:01

Comments   

 
0 #1 Geoff 2013-05-26 23:27
I'm pretty sure he was WWE Tag champ with Steve Austin in 2001.
Quote
 
 
0 #2 Committee Chairman 2013-08-31 19:58
Thanks Geoff.... We have taken care of that error!
Quote
 
 
0 #3 Dale 2014-01-19 16:42
They should put Triple H in because of D - Generation X. They should also put him in because of the McMahon - Helmsley Era or the Attitude Era. He was also apart of Evolution. So he should be in.
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Login

Click an icon to login instantly with your social account. (If you are logged into Facebook, clicking the Facebook icon will log you in to Not in Hall of Fame instantly.)

Search

  • 198. Misfits
    If you check through the list of critics top tens in the late 70’s and early 80’s you will find it littered with Punk bands. Despite the Misfits being one of the more popular Punk bands in history, critical love and the Misfits were not hand in hand.   A Punk Rock band that combined Horror Movie imagery to their…
    Comments (2)

red gold blue

© 2009-2012 Kirk Buchner & David Johnson