Committee Chairman
Kirk Buchner, "The Committee Chairman", is the owner and operator of the site. Kirk can be contacted at [email protected] .
2016 HOF Debate: Jeff Kent
Jan 02, 2016
Published in Hall of Fame Debates
Last year, we did our first ever debate on Notinhalloffame.com where we tackled the Hall of Fame merit of twenty-four men who are on the Hall of Fame ballot, in what was in our opinion the most loaded ballot in our lifetime.
Since it was so much fun last time, we thought we would do it again!
One thing that has not changed is the number. We will again debate twenty-four men who are on the ballot.
What has changed are the ones debating. Last year I had the pleasure of having DDT, the curator of DDT’s Pop Flies blog and D.K. of the Phillies Archivist blog. This year, Spheniscus, who has participated in past Rock and Roll discussions, will be joining me.
Chairman: I like Jeff Kent. I really do. I remember hating it when the Jays traded him, thinking that he might be something special, but considering the result (We got David Cone and a World Series that year) I can’t complain too much.
Still, when Kent would later light it up for San Francisco, including what would be an MVP season in 2000, I always thought of what he would still look like in a Jays uniform and how well he would fit in…and perhaps not fight with anyone in the dugout.
Kent is entering his third year on the ballot, where he dipped a bit last year to finish at 14%. I think he will see an increase as he was probably on the list of a few writers at the 11-14 spot, and with only Griffey (maybe Hoffman) replacing Biggio, Johnson, Martinez and Smoltz, the still thick log jam has lost a bit of lumber.
Still, if Kent can at the very least raise his total to 25%, with the reduced ballot tenure, I don’t think he has a shot to make it. Can he get an 11% increase?
Spheniscus: 11% seems like a lot. If only because there are plenty of people who aren’t voting for 10 names every year. I remember thinking as his career wound down… damn, Kent is a borderline Hall of Famer. And the Hall of Fame predictors seem to hold that to be true.
On Hall of Fame Monitor where a 100 score is a likely Hall of Famer, he is a 122. On Hall of Fame Standards where 50 is a likely Hall of Famer, he is a 51. For Gray Ink, though where an average Hall of Famer is a 144 score, he is only a 71. And JAWS holds him to be the 18th Greatest Second Baseman of All Time. All of whom, except #7 Bobby Grich (really?), #11 Lou Whitaker, #12 Chase Utley (still playing), #16 Robinson Cano (still playing, but really?), and #17 Willie Randolph are in the Hall.
So his argument is pretty good. Better than his excuse of getting injured washing out the bed of his truck when he actually crashed his motorcycle trying to pull wheelies anyway.
Given a rational list, meaning one where they had figured out what was going on with the whole steroid era, he would probably find his way into the Hall. But who knows? I mean you and I both think that no one got screwed during this process more than Lou Whitaker who never even made a second ballot. So it’s entirely possible I’m wrong. Kent will be on the ballot next year. But I don’t think he’ll get another 11%.
Chairman: You are right (again) that we both feel the same about Whitaker being screwed and about Kent not getting another 11 points. Quick question…before I move on…so you are not saying Grich belonged in the upper echelon? We have another discussion if that is the case!
Let me throw this at you. I think that the voters know they made a mistake with Whitaker, or at the very least erred that he should have stayed on the ballot a little longer. I am putting my conspiracy hat on and saying are they happy that he made a few more ballots so that there is no mistake?
You know what Spheniscus? After writing that, I know I am going off the deep end with that theory.
Let me throw something else at you. Do you think his “good ole boy” image that we saw in Survivor plays against him?
Spheniscus: I am not arguing that Bobby Grich was a great player, but the 7th greatest 2B of all time? That is better than Jackie Robinson. I have a hard time believing that Grich was a better player than Jackie Robinson.
As for being on Survivor and his image, it really is hard to think of a personality in sports less suited to game based on social skills than the prickly, at best, Kent. The good ole boy image was his version of Commander Data getting an emotions chip implant. He put it on because he didn’t know how else to interact with the world. Survivor’s choice of Scot Pollard for this year’s season is a much better decision.
All this said, Kent directly benefits from Biggio being gone from the ballot. I mean the second best second baseman on this list is Luis Castillo. And while we are doing 24 of these things, he is not one of them. How much of a jump do you think he gets?
Chairman: To Grich’s defense on being over Jackie Robinson, the trailblazer didn’t enter the Majors until he was 28, and had there been no color barrier, surely would be higher.
In regards to Survivor, I can give you one personality less suited for the show, and he did do it…John Rocker. I don’t know if you watched it, but if you haven’t it was exactly the disaster you thought it was!
My dream Sports Survivor sixteen you (didn’t) ask?
Sean Avery
Charles Barkley
Shawn Bradley
John Daly
Rickey Henderson
Caitlyn (Bruce) Jenner
Carl Lewis
Diego Maradonna
Steve Nash
Terrell Owens
Rafael Palmeiro
Bas Rutten
Pete Rose
Latrell Sprewell
Mike Tyson
Kurt Warner
That is ratings gold!
Oh…I don’t vote for Kent, though he is close on my ballot. I think he creeps up, but only to 17%.
Sphensicus: Very interesting group, although that is more a list for a Survivor Series than Survivor. Plus having Sean Avery on any show that isn’t Celebrity Deathmatch is not a show I am interested in. Seriously, fuck that guy. Although hopefully Tyson would take care of him. Quickly.
Anyway, Kent is someone I would vote for. He has my 11th spot. He originally had 10th, but with researching this someone who is upcoming took that spot from him. But I think that you are right on with the percentage. 17% is probably the right number for him.
Since it was so much fun last time, we thought we would do it again!
One thing that has not changed is the number. We will again debate twenty-four men who are on the ballot.
What has changed are the ones debating. Last year I had the pleasure of having DDT, the curator of DDT’s Pop Flies blog and D.K. of the Phillies Archivist blog. This year, Spheniscus, who has participated in past Rock and Roll discussions, will be joining me.
Chairman: I like Jeff Kent. I really do. I remember hating it when the Jays traded him, thinking that he might be something special, but considering the result (We got David Cone and a World Series that year) I can’t complain too much.
Still, when Kent would later light it up for San Francisco, including what would be an MVP season in 2000, I always thought of what he would still look like in a Jays uniform and how well he would fit in…and perhaps not fight with anyone in the dugout.
Kent is entering his third year on the ballot, where he dipped a bit last year to finish at 14%. I think he will see an increase as he was probably on the list of a few writers at the 11-14 spot, and with only Griffey (maybe Hoffman) replacing Biggio, Johnson, Martinez and Smoltz, the still thick log jam has lost a bit of lumber.
Still, if Kent can at the very least raise his total to 25%, with the reduced ballot tenure, I don’t think he has a shot to make it. Can he get an 11% increase?
Spheniscus: 11% seems like a lot. If only because there are plenty of people who aren’t voting for 10 names every year. I remember thinking as his career wound down… damn, Kent is a borderline Hall of Famer. And the Hall of Fame predictors seem to hold that to be true.
On Hall of Fame Monitor where a 100 score is a likely Hall of Famer, he is a 122. On Hall of Fame Standards where 50 is a likely Hall of Famer, he is a 51. For Gray Ink, though where an average Hall of Famer is a 144 score, he is only a 71. And JAWS holds him to be the 18th Greatest Second Baseman of All Time. All of whom, except #7 Bobby Grich (really?), #11 Lou Whitaker, #12 Chase Utley (still playing), #16 Robinson Cano (still playing, but really?), and #17 Willie Randolph are in the Hall.
So his argument is pretty good. Better than his excuse of getting injured washing out the bed of his truck when he actually crashed his motorcycle trying to pull wheelies anyway.
Given a rational list, meaning one where they had figured out what was going on with the whole steroid era, he would probably find his way into the Hall. But who knows? I mean you and I both think that no one got screwed during this process more than Lou Whitaker who never even made a second ballot. So it’s entirely possible I’m wrong. Kent will be on the ballot next year. But I don’t think he’ll get another 11%.
Chairman: You are right (again) that we both feel the same about Whitaker being screwed and about Kent not getting another 11 points. Quick question…before I move on…so you are not saying Grich belonged in the upper echelon? We have another discussion if that is the case!
Let me throw this at you. I think that the voters know they made a mistake with Whitaker, or at the very least erred that he should have stayed on the ballot a little longer. I am putting my conspiracy hat on and saying are they happy that he made a few more ballots so that there is no mistake?
You know what Spheniscus? After writing that, I know I am going off the deep end with that theory.
Let me throw something else at you. Do you think his “good ole boy” image that we saw in Survivor plays against him?
Spheniscus: I am not arguing that Bobby Grich was a great player, but the 7th greatest 2B of all time? That is better than Jackie Robinson. I have a hard time believing that Grich was a better player than Jackie Robinson.
As for being on Survivor and his image, it really is hard to think of a personality in sports less suited to game based on social skills than the prickly, at best, Kent. The good ole boy image was his version of Commander Data getting an emotions chip implant. He put it on because he didn’t know how else to interact with the world. Survivor’s choice of Scot Pollard for this year’s season is a much better decision.
All this said, Kent directly benefits from Biggio being gone from the ballot. I mean the second best second baseman on this list is Luis Castillo. And while we are doing 24 of these things, he is not one of them. How much of a jump do you think he gets?
Chairman: To Grich’s defense on being over Jackie Robinson, the trailblazer didn’t enter the Majors until he was 28, and had there been no color barrier, surely would be higher.
In regards to Survivor, I can give you one personality less suited for the show, and he did do it…John Rocker. I don’t know if you watched it, but if you haven’t it was exactly the disaster you thought it was!
My dream Sports Survivor sixteen you (didn’t) ask?
Sean Avery
Charles Barkley
Shawn Bradley
John Daly
Rickey Henderson
Caitlyn (Bruce) Jenner
Carl Lewis
Diego Maradonna
Steve Nash
Terrell Owens
Rafael Palmeiro
Bas Rutten
Pete Rose
Latrell Sprewell
Mike Tyson
Kurt Warner
That is ratings gold!
Oh…I don’t vote for Kent, though he is close on my ballot. I think he creeps up, but only to 17%.
Sphensicus: Very interesting group, although that is more a list for a Survivor Series than Survivor. Plus having Sean Avery on any show that isn’t Celebrity Deathmatch is not a show I am interested in. Seriously, fuck that guy. Although hopefully Tyson would take care of him. Quickly.
Anyway, Kent is someone I would vote for. He has my 11th spot. He originally had 10th, but with researching this someone who is upcoming took that spot from him. But I think that you are right on with the percentage. 17% is probably the right number for him.
2016 HOF Debate: Jason Kendall
Jan 02, 2016
Published in Hall of Fame Debates
Last year, we did our first ever debate on Notinhalloffame.com where we tackled the Hall of Fame merit of twenty-four men who are on the Hall of Fame ballot, in what was in our opinion the most loaded ballot in our lifetime.
Since it was so much fun last time, we thought we would do it again!
One thing that has not changed is the number. We will again debate twenty-four men who are on the ballot.
What has changed are the ones debating. Last year I had the pleasure of having DDT, the curator of DDT’s Pop Flies blog and D.K. of the Phillies Archivist blog. This year, Spheniscus, who has participated in past Rock and Roll discussions, will be joining me.
Chairman: I have always had a soft spot for spray hitters. Pete Rose was my first favorite player, and he was replaced with Tony Gwynn, who is still to this day my all-time favorite. Next to my Guy LaFleur rookie card, my rookie Gwynn card holds a special place in my collection.
Maybe that is why I really liked Jason Kendall, especially when he was with the Pittsburgh Pirates. With his .306 Batting Average and .387 On Base Percentage (specifically in Pittsburgh), it combined my original respect for Batting Average with the new vogue stat of OBP. It also didn’t hurt that he was a Catcher, which I now regard as the second most important position in Baseball (behind Pitcher of course).
Kendall was good (maybe Hall of Very Good caliber) but I know he won’t receive much support. Damn though, if I had a ballot it would be hard for me not to throw him a bone and cast a vote just out of respect.
Spheniscus: Well, here we have our first major disagreement. I think catcher is actually THE most important position in baseball. The Red Sox were pretty terrible this season. But they were doomed as of April 2nd, 2015 when defensive wizard Christian Vazquez underwent Tommy John surgery. Replacing him with Blake Swihart, a much better offensive player but a pretty mediocre defensive catcher, had a huge effect on pitchers who collectively had their worst years of their careers all at once. Also we had the corpse formally known as Hanley Ramirez on our team. That also did not help.
Anyway, back to the task at hand. Jason Kendall. Kendall has a shot. There are 13 catchers who have been elected to the Hall. A 14th should be elected this year in Piazza. According to JAWS, Kendall is the 18th best catcher in baseball history. Three others in front of him are not yet eligible for the Hall: Ivan Rodriguez (3), Joe Mauer (9), and Jorge Posada (16). Four others, Ted Simmons (10), Thurman Munson (12), Gene Tenace (13), and Bill Freehan (14) are off the ballot without being elected [INSERT TED SIMMONS SHOULD BE IN THE HALL ALREADY RANT HERE].
So he is clearly in the conversation. Or rather, he should be. But here’s the thing that is going to keep him out of the Hall. He made three All Star teams in 15 seasons. So regardless of his stats, he doesn’t FEEL like a Hall of Famer to people. Particularly since he spent so much time on terrible Pirates teams. If he couldn’t beat out Mike Williams or Jack Wilson to be the Pirates representative, how is he going to get into the Hall?
Without going too deeply into his stats (for once in these conversations) I think that he will get 5% or close to it. But I don’t think he is ever getting through the voting process and into Cooperstown.
Chairman: I always thought of Ramirez more as a pylon than a corpse.
JAWS does put him there in the conversation, and will probably get him a few articles on this for years to come…long after he is kicked off of the ballot this year.
Three All Star Games. That shouldn’t matter, but we know it will won’t it? I hate the fact that there are people who point to that as some sort of accomplishment when it is only a reflection of a popularity contest and/or what you did in a half season. Hell, we have had MVPs of certain years who didn’t make an All Star team, though nobody seems to remember that.
Do you remember when Sandy Alomar was constantly chosen as the American League starting Catcher? He went to the All-Star Game six times and only played in 100 Games four times. Alomar finishes 127th in JAWS by the way, and you know what? He finished with 2.8% of the ballot.
Here is my prediction. Jason Kendall does not beat that number…and that will be a travesty.
Spheniscus: Incidentally, Hanley wasn’t always a pylon. When he first came up with the Red Sox (before they sent him to Florida in the Josh Beckett/Mike Lowell trade), he was touted as the Slam Dunk Champion of the Dominican Republic. Although any evidence of that does not exist on the Google. So it probably isn’t true. Much like Dice-K’s gyroball.
Anyway, Kendall should do better than Alomar. He was a waaaay better player than Alomar. But there is a possibility that he would end up with less than 2.8%. But I am sticking by my closer to 5% prediction. I understand that is like ten votes, but it is significant. He will just never be a Hall of Famer via the writers. A future veteran’s committee will have to be the ones to take care of this.
Chairman: Ah…the gyroball. I am going to severe date myself, but I wonder if scouts thought it looked like when Radar O’Reilly (Gary Burghoff) was impressing Tommy Lasorda on a Fantasy Island episode where the ball did circles complete with Looney Tunes sound affects.
Crap, I just lost everybody under 40.
Kendall should do better than Alomar…but he won’t.
I already predicted he won’t beat Alomar’s 2.8%. I will be more specific. He won’t even make half of that. He wouldn’t get my fictional vote either, but at least I gave it a lot of thought. Sandy was never going to get that.
Spheniscus: He is not one of my 15 votes either. Your 1.4% is 8 votes. I still say it is higher just because of the people making a point of not voting for steroid users. 5% is essentially 27 votes. That seems a bit high. Let’s say 20 votes or 3.6%.
Since it was so much fun last time, we thought we would do it again!
One thing that has not changed is the number. We will again debate twenty-four men who are on the ballot.
What has changed are the ones debating. Last year I had the pleasure of having DDT, the curator of DDT’s Pop Flies blog and D.K. of the Phillies Archivist blog. This year, Spheniscus, who has participated in past Rock and Roll discussions, will be joining me.
Chairman: I have always had a soft spot for spray hitters. Pete Rose was my first favorite player, and he was replaced with Tony Gwynn, who is still to this day my all-time favorite. Next to my Guy LaFleur rookie card, my rookie Gwynn card holds a special place in my collection.
Maybe that is why I really liked Jason Kendall, especially when he was with the Pittsburgh Pirates. With his .306 Batting Average and .387 On Base Percentage (specifically in Pittsburgh), it combined my original respect for Batting Average with the new vogue stat of OBP. It also didn’t hurt that he was a Catcher, which I now regard as the second most important position in Baseball (behind Pitcher of course).
Kendall was good (maybe Hall of Very Good caliber) but I know he won’t receive much support. Damn though, if I had a ballot it would be hard for me not to throw him a bone and cast a vote just out of respect.
Spheniscus: Well, here we have our first major disagreement. I think catcher is actually THE most important position in baseball. The Red Sox were pretty terrible this season. But they were doomed as of April 2nd, 2015 when defensive wizard Christian Vazquez underwent Tommy John surgery. Replacing him with Blake Swihart, a much better offensive player but a pretty mediocre defensive catcher, had a huge effect on pitchers who collectively had their worst years of their careers all at once. Also we had the corpse formally known as Hanley Ramirez on our team. That also did not help.
Anyway, back to the task at hand. Jason Kendall. Kendall has a shot. There are 13 catchers who have been elected to the Hall. A 14th should be elected this year in Piazza. According to JAWS, Kendall is the 18th best catcher in baseball history. Three others in front of him are not yet eligible for the Hall: Ivan Rodriguez (3), Joe Mauer (9), and Jorge Posada (16). Four others, Ted Simmons (10), Thurman Munson (12), Gene Tenace (13), and Bill Freehan (14) are off the ballot without being elected [INSERT TED SIMMONS SHOULD BE IN THE HALL ALREADY RANT HERE].
So he is clearly in the conversation. Or rather, he should be. But here’s the thing that is going to keep him out of the Hall. He made three All Star teams in 15 seasons. So regardless of his stats, he doesn’t FEEL like a Hall of Famer to people. Particularly since he spent so much time on terrible Pirates teams. If he couldn’t beat out Mike Williams or Jack Wilson to be the Pirates representative, how is he going to get into the Hall?
Without going too deeply into his stats (for once in these conversations) I think that he will get 5% or close to it. But I don’t think he is ever getting through the voting process and into Cooperstown.
Chairman: I always thought of Ramirez more as a pylon than a corpse.
JAWS does put him there in the conversation, and will probably get him a few articles on this for years to come…long after he is kicked off of the ballot this year.
Three All Star Games. That shouldn’t matter, but we know it will won’t it? I hate the fact that there are people who point to that as some sort of accomplishment when it is only a reflection of a popularity contest and/or what you did in a half season. Hell, we have had MVPs of certain years who didn’t make an All Star team, though nobody seems to remember that.
Do you remember when Sandy Alomar was constantly chosen as the American League starting Catcher? He went to the All-Star Game six times and only played in 100 Games four times. Alomar finishes 127th in JAWS by the way, and you know what? He finished with 2.8% of the ballot.
Here is my prediction. Jason Kendall does not beat that number…and that will be a travesty.
Spheniscus: Incidentally, Hanley wasn’t always a pylon. When he first came up with the Red Sox (before they sent him to Florida in the Josh Beckett/Mike Lowell trade), he was touted as the Slam Dunk Champion of the Dominican Republic. Although any evidence of that does not exist on the Google. So it probably isn’t true. Much like Dice-K’s gyroball.
Anyway, Kendall should do better than Alomar. He was a waaaay better player than Alomar. But there is a possibility that he would end up with less than 2.8%. But I am sticking by my closer to 5% prediction. I understand that is like ten votes, but it is significant. He will just never be a Hall of Famer via the writers. A future veteran’s committee will have to be the ones to take care of this.
Chairman: Ah…the gyroball. I am going to severe date myself, but I wonder if scouts thought it looked like when Radar O’Reilly (Gary Burghoff) was impressing Tommy Lasorda on a Fantasy Island episode where the ball did circles complete with Looney Tunes sound affects.
Crap, I just lost everybody under 40.
Kendall should do better than Alomar…but he won’t.
I already predicted he won’t beat Alomar’s 2.8%. I will be more specific. He won’t even make half of that. He wouldn’t get my fictional vote either, but at least I gave it a lot of thought. Sandy was never going to get that.
Spheniscus: He is not one of my 15 votes either. Your 1.4% is 8 votes. I still say it is higher just because of the people making a point of not voting for steroid users. 5% is essentially 27 votes. That seems a bit high. Let’s say 20 votes or 3.6%.
2016 HOF Debate: Ken Griffey Jr.
Jan 02, 2016
Published in Hall of Fame Debates
Last year, we did our first ever debate on Notinhalloffame.com where we tackled the Hall of Fame merit of twenty-four men who are on the Hall of Fame ballot, in what was in our opinion the most loaded ballot in our lifetime.
Since it was so much fun last time, we thought we would do it again!
One thing that has not changed is the number. We will again debate twenty-four men who are on the ballot.
What has changed are the ones debating. Last year I had the pleasure of having DDT, the curator of DDT’s Pop Flies blog and D.K. of the Phillies Archivist blog. This year, Spheniscus, who has participated in past Rock and Roll discussions, will be joining me.
Chairman: This should be a no-brainer, with stress on the word “should”. I have yet to read a publication, a blog, or a smoke signal that says that Ken Griffey Jr. is not a Hall of Famer. Yet, there is going to be a handful of voters who won’t check his name off and we know why don’t we?
It will be a few of those self-righteous pricks who will say “well, I don’t know who used PEDs or not from that era” and point to the enlarged head that he had when he played for Mr. Burns softball team as evidence that he used HGH.
It was Brain and Nerve tonic, goddamn it, and it was not on the banned substance list!
Bad Springfield jokes aside, Griffey is this year’s lock, and should be. My only question is what the second digit is on the vote, because the first one is a nine!
Spheniscus: That’s the thing though, there is no way to know who did and didn’t use at that time. Mike Piazza by practically any measure is the greatest hitting catcher of all time. He should have been a first ballot Hall of Famer. He’s now on his 4th time through? Why? Because he was a big guy and played in the steroid era and is therefore part of the whisper campaign.
Why don’t we think Griffey used? Because he was a phenom? Well, so was his teammate Alex Rodriguez, who was a user. Because he was skinny? Have you seen Ryan Franklin? He’d need to wear a dive belt to hit 150 pounds. He was a user. Because he’s a nice guy? Mike Cameron may be the nicest person ever in baseball. He was a user.
To be fair, I don’t believe that Griffey used. And obviously what my father would have called the Ivory Soap percentage of the voters don’t either. He will most likely end up with 95% plus of the vote. But if people take the stand that no one from the era gets in because they don’t know who used, the stand is stupid but it is at least consistent. I don’t hold it against them. Those guys aren’t the self-righteous pricks in my book. They are dumbasses, but not pricks.
Those who don’t vote for him because it is the first time he is eligible and not even Babe Ruth got 100% of the vote are the self-righteous pricks. Those people can just turn in their ballot privileges.
Although I do wonder if there are a percentage that won’t vote for Griffey knowing that he will skate in and that an extra vote for someone further down the ballot would help someone they think is a worthy candidate. If you truly believe that Edgar Martinez is a Hall of Famer, but he is 11th on your list, why not leave Griffey blank and vote for Martinez? That may also depress Griffey’s vote percentage while the people who are doing it are actually on the side of the angels.
Chairman: Griffey will go down in a long list of men who should have received 100 percent of the ballot because of the self-righteous pricks/dumbasses we both spoke of. Personally, I prefer the term “sanctimonious douchebag”, but maybe that is because how I have been viewing Hawkeye in M*A*S*H reruns last night in a drunken bender watching that show on a marathon.
While you are right that we don’t know whether Griffey Jr. juiced or not, and I am with you in that he probably didn’t, based mostly on his post 30 numbers as opposed to prior to. It was a natural decline that made sense, not some Dorian Gray/Benjamin Button statistical increase like some had.
Slight tangent here; looking back it is impossible to believe that the Mariners with Griffey, Martinez, A-Rod and Randy Johnson never made the World Series. Maybe even more surprising is that Jay Buhner was the most popular of all of them for a time. If he had hair, half the people outside of Seattle would not know his name, and he wouldn’t have been mentioned in a Seinfeld episode.
Actually that was a really big tangent.
Spheniscus: Funny, I presume that Sanctimonious Douchebag is the name of the band that always opens for Train on every one of their tours.
And the real reason that people remember Buhner is that it is the last good trade the Mariners ever made. Not that they did historically badly in their trades of Griffey or Johnson, but the Mariners have built a reputation as the team you talk to when you want to rebuild your franchise. The 2004 and 2007 World Series never happen if the Mariners don’t exchange Derek Lowe and Jason Varitek for Heathcliff Slocumb. Although to be fair they definitely got the better of us in 1996 when we traded an over-the-hill 34-year-old Jamie Moyer for the seven year younger Right Fielder of the future Darren Bragg. A man who would retire a FULL EIGHT YEARS BEFORE MOYER!
Anyway, where were we? Oh yes, Griffey. He’s getting in. Easily.
Chairman: Now you got me thinking…
“Sanctimonious Douchebag” would be a great name for either Coldplay or Nickelback. The fact that Coldplay is doing the Halftime show at this year’s Super Bowl has made me consider starting a crowdfund to get the Wayans Brothers to bring back their halftime counter on Fox in a “In Living Color” comeback.
Wait, Moyer retired? Doesn’t he seem like somebody who would be signed by the St. Paul Saints right now?
Anyways, Griffey has my pretend vote, and the real one of most of the voters. Since, there has never been (and never will be because there are too many writers who enjoy the fact that they have this power) a candidate entering at 100%, I will peg Junior’s tally at 97.3%.
Although that 2.7% need to have their voting privileges revoked immediately as well as their access to any computer so that they can continue their writing career.
Spheniscus: So with 550 voters, 97.3 means 15 people wouldn’t vote for Griffey. That actually seems too low to me. I’m going to presume there are 25 or 30 people who don’t for one reason or another. 25 means 95.5%. I’ll stick there.
Since it was so much fun last time, we thought we would do it again!
One thing that has not changed is the number. We will again debate twenty-four men who are on the ballot.
What has changed are the ones debating. Last year I had the pleasure of having DDT, the curator of DDT’s Pop Flies blog and D.K. of the Phillies Archivist blog. This year, Spheniscus, who has participated in past Rock and Roll discussions, will be joining me.
Chairman: This should be a no-brainer, with stress on the word “should”. I have yet to read a publication, a blog, or a smoke signal that says that Ken Griffey Jr. is not a Hall of Famer. Yet, there is going to be a handful of voters who won’t check his name off and we know why don’t we?
It will be a few of those self-righteous pricks who will say “well, I don’t know who used PEDs or not from that era” and point to the enlarged head that he had when he played for Mr. Burns softball team as evidence that he used HGH.
It was Brain and Nerve tonic, goddamn it, and it was not on the banned substance list!
Bad Springfield jokes aside, Griffey is this year’s lock, and should be. My only question is what the second digit is on the vote, because the first one is a nine!
Spheniscus: That’s the thing though, there is no way to know who did and didn’t use at that time. Mike Piazza by practically any measure is the greatest hitting catcher of all time. He should have been a first ballot Hall of Famer. He’s now on his 4th time through? Why? Because he was a big guy and played in the steroid era and is therefore part of the whisper campaign.
Why don’t we think Griffey used? Because he was a phenom? Well, so was his teammate Alex Rodriguez, who was a user. Because he was skinny? Have you seen Ryan Franklin? He’d need to wear a dive belt to hit 150 pounds. He was a user. Because he’s a nice guy? Mike Cameron may be the nicest person ever in baseball. He was a user.
To be fair, I don’t believe that Griffey used. And obviously what my father would have called the Ivory Soap percentage of the voters don’t either. He will most likely end up with 95% plus of the vote. But if people take the stand that no one from the era gets in because they don’t know who used, the stand is stupid but it is at least consistent. I don’t hold it against them. Those guys aren’t the self-righteous pricks in my book. They are dumbasses, but not pricks.
Those who don’t vote for him because it is the first time he is eligible and not even Babe Ruth got 100% of the vote are the self-righteous pricks. Those people can just turn in their ballot privileges.
Although I do wonder if there are a percentage that won’t vote for Griffey knowing that he will skate in and that an extra vote for someone further down the ballot would help someone they think is a worthy candidate. If you truly believe that Edgar Martinez is a Hall of Famer, but he is 11th on your list, why not leave Griffey blank and vote for Martinez? That may also depress Griffey’s vote percentage while the people who are doing it are actually on the side of the angels.
Chairman: Griffey will go down in a long list of men who should have received 100 percent of the ballot because of the self-righteous pricks/dumbasses we both spoke of. Personally, I prefer the term “sanctimonious douchebag”, but maybe that is because how I have been viewing Hawkeye in M*A*S*H reruns last night in a drunken bender watching that show on a marathon.
While you are right that we don’t know whether Griffey Jr. juiced or not, and I am with you in that he probably didn’t, based mostly on his post 30 numbers as opposed to prior to. It was a natural decline that made sense, not some Dorian Gray/Benjamin Button statistical increase like some had.
Slight tangent here; looking back it is impossible to believe that the Mariners with Griffey, Martinez, A-Rod and Randy Johnson never made the World Series. Maybe even more surprising is that Jay Buhner was the most popular of all of them for a time. If he had hair, half the people outside of Seattle would not know his name, and he wouldn’t have been mentioned in a Seinfeld episode.
Actually that was a really big tangent.
Spheniscus: Funny, I presume that Sanctimonious Douchebag is the name of the band that always opens for Train on every one of their tours.
And the real reason that people remember Buhner is that it is the last good trade the Mariners ever made. Not that they did historically badly in their trades of Griffey or Johnson, but the Mariners have built a reputation as the team you talk to when you want to rebuild your franchise. The 2004 and 2007 World Series never happen if the Mariners don’t exchange Derek Lowe and Jason Varitek for Heathcliff Slocumb. Although to be fair they definitely got the better of us in 1996 when we traded an over-the-hill 34-year-old Jamie Moyer for the seven year younger Right Fielder of the future Darren Bragg. A man who would retire a FULL EIGHT YEARS BEFORE MOYER!
Anyway, where were we? Oh yes, Griffey. He’s getting in. Easily.
Chairman: Now you got me thinking…
“Sanctimonious Douchebag” would be a great name for either Coldplay or Nickelback. The fact that Coldplay is doing the Halftime show at this year’s Super Bowl has made me consider starting a crowdfund to get the Wayans Brothers to bring back their halftime counter on Fox in a “In Living Color” comeback.
Wait, Moyer retired? Doesn’t he seem like somebody who would be signed by the St. Paul Saints right now?
Anyways, Griffey has my pretend vote, and the real one of most of the voters. Since, there has never been (and never will be because there are too many writers who enjoy the fact that they have this power) a candidate entering at 100%, I will peg Junior’s tally at 97.3%.
Although that 2.7% need to have their voting privileges revoked immediately as well as their access to any computer so that they can continue their writing career.
Spheniscus: So with 550 voters, 97.3 means 15 people wouldn’t vote for Griffey. That actually seems too low to me. I’m going to presume there are 25 or 30 people who don’t for one reason or another. 25 means 95.5%. I’ll stick there.
2016 HOF Debate: Barry Bonds
Jan 01, 2016
Published in Hall of Fame Debates
Last year, we did our first ever debate on Notinhalloffame.com where we tackled the Hall of Fame merit of twenty-four men who are on the Hall of Fame ballot, in what was in our opinion the most loaded ballot in our lifetime.
Since it was so much fun last time, we thought we would do it again!
One thing that has not changed is the number. We will again debate twenty-four men who are on the ballot.
What has changed are the ones debating. Last year I had the pleasure of having DDT, the curator of DDT’s Pop Flies blog and D.K. of the Phillies Archivist blog. This year, Spheniscus, who has participated in past Rock and Roll discussions, will be joining me.
Since it was so much fun last time, we thought we would do it again!
One thing that has not changed is the number. We will again debate twenty-four men who are on the ballot.
What has changed are the ones debating. Last year I had the pleasure of having DDT, the curator of DDT’s Pop Flies blog and D.K. of the Phillies Archivist blog. This year, Spheniscus, who has participated in past Rock and Roll discussions, will be joining me.