Crypto casinos are reshaping how people play online. Picking the right cryptocurrency can make a huge difference in your experience. The coin you choose affects transaction speed, fees, and whether your bankroll stays stable or fluctuates wildly while you're mid-game.
Dozens of cryptocurrencies exist, but three dominate the online casino space: Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Tether (USDT). Each has unique strengths and trade-offs. This guide compares them head-to-head across the factors that matter most: cost, speed, volatility, platform support, and ease of use. By the end, you'll know exactly which crypto fits your playing style.
Let's break it down.
Bitcoin is the most widely accepted cryptocurrency at online casinos. Walk into any crypto casino site, and you'll find BTC support front and center. Casinos like JB.com, BiggerZ.com and nearly every other operator accept Bitcoin deposits and withdrawals, making it the default choice for millions of players worldwide.
Why does Bitcoin hold this position? Simple. It was first, it's trusted, and it's everywhere.
Players who prioritize platform compatibility, want access to the largest bonuses, and are comfortable with price fluctuations.
Ethereum brings more to the table than just payment processing. Its smart contract functionality powers decentralized casinos, provably fair games, and NFT-based reward systems. ETH is the second most accepted crypto at online casinos, and its technical capabilities open doors that Bitcoin can't.
If you're interested in playing on decentralized platforms or want faster transaction times than Bitcoin, Ethereum deserves your attention.
Players who value faster transactions, want access to decentralized casino platforms, or plan to use Ethereum-based dApps and provably fair games.
Tether (USDT) is a stablecoin pegged 1:1 to the US dollar. Your $100 deposit stays worth $100 when you're ready to withdraw, no matter what happens in the crypto market. This stability makes USDT the go-to choice for players who want predictability.
If you've ever deposited Bitcoin, watched the price drop 8% during your session, and then cashed out less than you started with (despite winning), you understand the appeal of stablecoins.
Players who want a stable, dollar-equivalent bankroll with low fees (especially on TRC-20) and prefer to keep gambling and investing as separate activities.
Here's the breakdown in table form:
|
Factor |
BTC |
ETH |
USDT |
|
Casino Acceptance |
Highest (near-universal) |
Very high |
High and growing |
|
Transaction Speed |
~10 min (on-chain) |
~12 sec (L1) |
Near-instant (TRC-20) |
|
Average Fees |
$1–$5 |
Variable ($0.50–$5+) |
Near-zero (TRC-20) |
|
Price Volatility |
High |
High |
None (pegged to USD) |
|
Bonus Availability |
Largest offers |
Moderate |
Growing USDT bonuses |
|
Smart Contracts |
Limited |
Yes (dApps, provably fair) |
No |
|
Best For |
Maximum compatibility |
dApps & speed |
Bankroll stability |
The "best" coin depends entirely on what matters most to you. No single answer fits every player.
Making the right choice comes down to your priorities. Here's a quick decision guide:
Pro tip: Many experienced players use a combination. USDT for day-to-day play (stable value, low fees) and BTC or ETH for platforms that offer better bonuses on those coins. You can switch between them based on the situation.
Whichever coin you pick, verify the casino supports it, check network and fee details, and never send funds on the wrong network. One wrong click can mean lost money with no way to recover it.
Q: Can I use more than one cryptocurrency at the same casino?
A: Yes, most crypto casinos support multiple coins. You can deposit in one and withdraw in another if the platform allows it.
Q: Which crypto has the lowest fees for casino deposits?
A: USDT on the TRC-20 (Tron) network typically has near-zero transaction fees, making it the cheapest option.
Q: Will my Bitcoin deposit lose value while I play?
A: It can. BTC is volatile, so your deposit may increase or decrease in value during your session. Use USDT if you want to avoid this risk.
Yes, we know that this is taking a while!
As many of you know, we at Notinhalloffame.com are slowly generating the top 50 of each major North American sports team. That being said, we maintain and update our existing Top 50 lists annually. As such, we are delighted to present our pre-2026 revision of our top 50 Chicago Cubs.
As for all of our top 50 players in baseball, we look at the following:
1. Duration and Impact.
2. Traditional statistics and how they finished in the Major League Baseball.
3. Advanced Statistics.
4. Playoff performance.
5. Their respective legacy on the team.
6. How successful the team was when he was there.
7. Respecting the era in which they played.
Criteria 1-4 will make up the lion’s share of the algorithm. Please note that we have implemented this for the first time. This has changed the rankings all throughout the board.
Last year, the White Sox were awful, winning only 60 Games. None of the active players made a debut on the Top 50, nor were there any active players on the list.
As always, we present our top five, which saw a slight change.
1. Frank Thomas
2. Ed Walsh
3. Luke Appling
4. Ted Lyons
5. Red Faber
You can find the entire list here.
The new algorithm has led us to revise the list, with the most notable change in the top five, where Ed Walsh and Luke Appling flipped spots.
We thank you for your continued support of our lists on Notinhalloffame.com.
Last January, the Baseball Hall of Fame announced the Class of 2026, and for us at Notinhalloffame.com, this means it is time to revise the list of those to consider for the Hall.
At present, it is a work in progress, as we have multiple projects underway (including prepping the ballot for the 2026 United States Athletic Hall of Fame), but we are also slowly working on the Baseball Hall revision.
Our revisions take into account the following:
Simple, right?
As this is a work in progress, the section is under construction, but we will keep you apprised of the changes as we go.
The entire list (again, it is under construction) is here, but in the meantime, here is the revised 31-40:
31. Buster Posey (Debut)
32. Stan Hack
33. David Cone
34. Graig Nettles
35. Bill Freehan
36. Dave Stieb
37. Kevin Brown
38. Bob Caruthers
39. Andy Pettitte
40. Allie Reynolds
Look for more updates soon.
I own and run three sites, one of which is the United States Athletic Hall of Fame. The USAHOF is a grassroots organization designed to honor the greatest American Athletes of all time.
Thus far, we have completed three years of inductions. The way it works is that we have a committee of sportswriters and athletes who help us decide which athletes should be on the ballot. A ballot is provided to the committee with 125 athletes, and the top 25 advance to the public ballot. This is online for six months, and the top 25 athletes (along with five coaches, contributors, and broadcasters).
I am seeking to expand the athletes who help us with the voting process.
It would only take roughly ten minutes of your time, and is all done digitally. We would then ask your permission to use your name as one of the committee members.
Our site is www.theusahof.com, and please let me know if you are interested or have any questions.
Looking forward to hearing back from you!
Kirk
Andre Dawson is getting his wish…sort of.
When Dawson was elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame in 2010, he requested that the hat on his plaque be the Chicago Cubs’ “C”. The Hall nixed the request and enshrined him with the Montreal Expos hat instead. Dawson played 11 seasons, compared to six in Chicago, but it was at Wrigley Field where he won the 1987 MVP and felt most at home. Dawson again requested in 2023 that the hat be changed, but instead, the Hall compromised by making his hat have no logo at all.
This reflects the Hall’s 2014 decision to allow players with identities across multiple teams to enter with a blank cap; had that rule been in place when Dawson was elected, it would have been his choice.
With the Cubs, Dawson was a five-time All-Star and blasted 174 Home Runs.