The NASCAR Hall of Fame announced its 2027 Hall of Fame Class, which will consist of Kevin Harvick, Jeff Burton, Larry Phillips, and Lesa France Kennedy.

Harvick and Burton enter via the Modern Era Ballot, with Phillips joining via the Pioneer Era Ballot.

Harvick has 60 wins in the NASCAR Cup Series and is the 2014 Cup Series Champion.  He boasts a 2007 Daytona 500 win, three Coca-Cola 600 wins, two Southern 500 wins, and three Brickyard 400 wins.  He also boasts 47 wins in the NASCAR O’Reilly Auto Parts Series and 14 wins in the NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series.  He was also named in 2023 as one of NASCAR’s 75 Greatest Drivers.

Burton captured 21 NASCAR Cup Series wins, including one Southern 500 and two Coca-Cola 600s.  He also won 27 races on the NASCAR O’Reilly Auto Parts Series and, like Harvick, was named as one of NASCAR’s 75 Greatest Drivers.

Phillips enters on the Pioneer Ballot.  He won five NASCAR Weekly Series National Championships and is a short-track and dirt-track legend.  He was also named to NASCAR’s 75 Greatest Drivers.

France Kennedy enters via the Landmark Award.  The daughter of Bill France Jr. is currently the Executive Vice Chair of NASCAR.

The Class of 2027 will be officially inducted in Charlotte on January 22, 2027.

We here at Notinhalloffame would like to congratulate the members of the NASCAR Class of 2027.

Yes, we know that this is taking a while!

As many of you know, we at Notinhalloffame.com are slowly generating the top 50 of each major North American sports team. That being said, we maintain and update our existing Top 50 lists annually.  We are pleased to present our pre-2026 revision of our top 50 New York Mets.

As for all of our top 50 players in baseball, we look at the following: 

1.  Duration and Impact.

2.  Traditional statistics and how they finished in the Major League Baseball.

3.  Advanced Statistics.

4.  Playoff performance.

5. Their respective legacy on the team.

6. How successful the team was when he was there.

7. Respecting the era in which they played.

Criteria 1-4 will make up the lion’s share of the algorithm.  Please note that we have implemented this for the first time.  This has changed the rankings all throughout the board.

Last year, the Mets were a disappointment, winning 83 Games and failing to make the playoffs despite a loaded roster.  There were no new additions among active players, though the algorithm change allowed a former Met to enter the Top 50.  There were three elevations of active players based on last season.

As always, we present our top five, which saw no changes.

1. Tom Seaver
2. Dwight Gooden
3. Jacob deGrom
4. David Wright
5. Darryl Strawberry

You can find the entire list here.

Pete Alonso, who signed with the Baltimore Orioles in the off-season, did enough to move from #17 to #10.

Shortstop Francisco Lindor climbed to #18 from #24.

Outfielder Brandon Nimmo edged up one spot to #19.  He is now a Texas Ranger.

Jeff McNeil, who is now with the Athletics, went up two spots to #20.

The new algorithm brought Lee Mazzilli (at #49) and pushed Juan Lagares off the Top 50.

We thank you for your continued support of our lists on Notinhalloffame.com.

1995 Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Project Class.

Here we are!  Again!!

If you have been following our Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Project, you know we have asked the question: What if the PFHOF had begun in January 1946?

After soliciting and obtaining a passionate group of football fans and historians, we sent out a ballot for a Preliminary Vote, in which each voter selected 25 names as their semi-finalists and five names for the Senior Pool. We then asked the group to vote for their 15 Finalists in the Modern Era and 3 in the Senior Category. The final stage was to vote for their five Modern Era inductee and one Senior inductee.

This is the result of the 50th official class. 

Below are the final results of this project based on 31 votes.

Remember that we have reverted back to the top five candidates entering the Hall in the Modern Era

This is for the “Modern Era”

*Bold indicates they have been elected to the Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Class of 1995:

Player	Year of Eligibility	Vote Total
Steve Largent WR	1	26
Mike Haynes DB	1	22
Jackie Smith TE	12	20
Tommy Nobis LB	14	10
Jan Stenerud PK	5	10
Bob Griese QB	10	9
Ray Guy P	4	8
L.C. Greenwood DE	9	7
Claude Humphrey DE	9	7
Charlie Joiner WR	4	7
Kenny Easley DB	3	7
John Stallworth WR	3	7
Dave Robinson LB	16	6
Bob Kuechenberg G-T-C	7	3
Ken Stabler QB	6	3
Cliff Branch WR	5	0

This is for the “Senior Era”, 

*Bold indicates they have been elected to the Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Class of 1995.

Roger Brown DT	1	12
Pat Harder E-HB-TE	17	9
Arch Ward CONTRIBUTOR	6	7
None of the Above	N/A	3

This is for the “Coaches/Contributors”, 

*Bold indicates they have been elected to the Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Class of 1995.

Wellington Mara (Owner)	9	11
Ralph Wilson (Owner)	4	10
Gil Brandt (Scout)	4	8
None of the Above		2

About the 1995 Inductees:

Steve Largent, WR, SEA 1976-89: Inducted in the Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Project in 1995 on his 1st Ballot.  Inducted into the actual Pro Football Hall of Fame in 1995.

A member of the Seattle Seahawks for his entire career, Steve Largent is one of the most unlikely offensive superstars in history.

Largent fell to the fourth round after having a great college run at Tulsa, but the team that drafted him (Houston) didn’t see much in him and thought they got a good return on a future eighth round pick, considering they were going to cut him anyway.  This happened during his rookie pre-season, and Seattle arguably stole the player who would become their best Wide Receiver in franchise history. 

Never known for his speed, Largent was one of the most sure-handed receivers in the game.  He had 705 Receiving Yards as a rookie, and in 1978, he went to his first of what would be seven Pro Bowls.  In all of those Pro Bowl campaigns, Largent hit four digits in Receiving Yards, and he would also have the eighth one.  Largent would also lead all receivers in Yards twice (1979 & 1985), with the latter year earning him a First Team All-Pro.  It is also worth mentioning that Largent won the Walter Payton Man of the Year in his penultimate season.

At the time of his retirement, he was the league-leader in Receptions (819), Receiving Yards (13,089), and Receiving Touchdowns (100).

In 1992, Largent would become the first player to have his number retired by the team.  He was also named to the NFL 100^th Anniversary Team.

Mike Haynes, DB, NWE 1976-82 & RAI 1983-89: Inducted in the Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Project in 1995 on his 1st Ballot.  Inducted into the actual Pro Football Hall of Fame in 1997.

Mike Haynes is regarded as one of the greatest NFL cornerbacks, known for his speed, quickness, and man-to-man coverage. After a standout college career at Arizona State, he was drafted fifth overall by the Patriots in 1976. Haynes made an immediate impact, winning NFL Defensive Rookie of the Year after intercepting eight passes and excelling as a punt returner. Over seven seasons, he earned six Pro Bowl selections and was the first in franchise history to return a punt for a touchdown.

In 1983, Haynes joined the Los Angeles Raiders, teaming up with Lester Hayes to become one of football's most dominant cornerback duos. Arriving mid-season, he helped the Raiders win Super Bowl XVIII 38-9 over the Redskins. Over seven years, Haynes became a shutdown corner, earning three Pro Bowl selections and back-to-back first-team All-Pro honors in 1984 and 1985.

Haynes retired after the 1989 season with 46 career interceptions and a legacy of absolute defensive dominance. His career has been heavily decorated; he was named to the NFL 1980s All-Decade Team and the NFL 75th and 100th Anniversary Team. 

Jackie Smith, TE, STL 1963-77 & DAL 1978.  Inducted in the Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Project in 1995 on his 12th Ballot.  Inducted into the actual Pro Football Hall of Fame in 1994.

The speed of Jackie Smith earned him a late round selection (10^th Round) in 1963 by St. Louis, who converted the Flanker into a Tight End.

Smith was an excellent blocker, but his receiving skills helped transform the position, and he amassed 7,918 Yards with 40 Touchdowns from the air.  He would also earn five consecutive Pro Bowl Selections (1966-70).

Notably, Smith also served as the Cardinals’ punter for his first three years.

Tommy Nobis, LB, ATL 1966-76.  Inducted in the Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Project in 1995 on his 14th Ballot.  Was never inducted into the actual Pro Football Hall of Fame.

Tommy Nobis, affectionately known as "Mr. Falcon," was a founding figure of the Atlanta Falcons franchise. As the first overall pick in the 1966 NFL Draft, he made an immediate and remarkable impact, initially with the expansion team. In his debut season, Nobis recorded an astonishing 294 combined tackles, a franchise record that still stands and is unofficially the highest single-season tackle total in NFL history. His fierce defensive play earned him the 1966 NFL Rookie of the Year award and the first of five Pro Bowl selections in his career.

Throughout his 11-year career with the Falcons, Nobis was celebrated as one of football's most formidable and intimidating middle linebackers. He led Atlanta in tackles in nine seasons, earned First-team All-Pro honors in 1967, and was included in the NFL 1960s All-Decade Team despite playing for a struggling expansion team. Remarkably, even after major knee surgeries, his legendary toughness enabled him to return to top form, earning his final Pro Bowl selection in 1972. Nobis retired after the 1976 season with 12 career interceptions, and his No. 60 jersey was the first ever retired by the Falcons organization.

Jan Stenerud, PK, KC 1967-79, GNB 1980-83 & MIN 1984-85.  Inducted in the Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Project in 1995 on his 5th Ballot.  Inducted into the actual Pro Football Hall of Fame in 1991.

From Norway, Jan Stenerud arrived in the U.S. on a ski jumping scholarship at Montana State.  The Football Coach learned of Stenerud’s kicking abilities and offered him a tryout, which he made.  Stenerud would set a then-record 59 Yard Field Goal, and following college, he was selected by the Kansas City Chiefs, where he became one of the first dedicated Place Kickers in the game.

Stenerud’s soccer style of kicking took over the game, and he was consistently among one of the most accurate kickers for years.  A two-time AFL All-Star and four-time Pro Bowl Selection over three different decades. Stenerud helped the Chiefs win Super Bowl IV and remained with them until 1979, then spent four years with Green Bay before concluding his career with two years in Minnesota. 

Roger Brown DT, DET 1960-66 & RAM 1967-69.  Inducted in the Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Project in 1995 on his 1st Senior Ballot.  Was never inducted into the actual Pro Football Hall of Fame.

It is alleged that Roger Brown was the first legitimate 300-pounder in the National Football League. Nowadays, this is commonplace, but Brown proved that a much larger man could be very athletic. It is also amazing that someone so big could be forgotten so quickly.

Brown was good, but he played alongside other greats of the sport. As a Detroit Lion, he played with Alex Karras, who got all the headlines. Later, he became a Los Angeles Ram and was the fourth cog in the Rams’ Fearsome Foursome defense behind the big names of Deacon Jones and Merlin Olsen. Roger Brown may not have become a household name, but his size and skill made him one of the most feared defensive linemen in the league, and his Pro Bowls were earned, not by riding the coattails of his more famous teammates.

What would Roger Brown’s legacy be if he had been the featured defensive star of his team? He was good enough to have been, but circumstances blessed him with the chance to play with the greats and cursed him to be in their shadows; nevertheless, he is now in the Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Project.

Wellington Mara, Owner, NYG 1930-2004.  Inducted in the Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Project in 1995 on his 9th Coach/Contributor Ballot.  Inducted into the actual Pro Football Hall of Fame in 1997.

Wellington Mara had an 81-year career with the New York Giants, transforming the club from a startup to a key NFL franchise. Starting as a nine-year-old ball boy for his father's team, Mara and his brother Jack became co-owners in 1930 when he was 14. After graduating from Fordham and serving as a U.S. Navy officer during WWII, he returned to manage player personnel. His talent for spotting skilled players led to drafting legends like Frank Gifford and Roosevelt Brown and making key trades, building the dominant Giants teams of the late 1950s and early 1960s. He became team president in 1965, guiding the franchise through a rebuilding era that resulted in Super Bowl wins.

Beyond his dedication to New York, Mara was a key figure in the NFL, advocating for policies that promoted the sport's growth. He prioritized league interests over his own for fairness, supporting equal sharing of TV revenues, which helped small-market teams thrive. Mara also played a crucial role in league leadership, breaking a 1960 deadlock to elect Pete Rozelle as commissioner and serving as the National Football Conference president from 1984 until his death in 2005. Each official game ball bears his nickname, "The Duke,” honoring his systemic impact.

Selecting the right motorsport sponsorship property types is the most critical decision a brand makes before entering the paddock. For US brands, the choice isn't just about the series; it’s about where the "anchor" of the partnership sits. Should you back a global icon like Lewis Hamilton, align with a powerhouse like McLaren, or become a Formula 1 sponsorship itself? Each path offers vastly different levels of access, visibility, and legal rights.

As we move into the 2026 season, the stakes have never been higher. Total sponsorship investment in Formula 1 is projected to exceed $3 billion this year, a 15% increase from 2025 (Ampere Analysis, 2026). With the US market now contributing a 68% increase in sponsorship spend since 2023, a sports marketing consultant for sponsorship is essential to navigate these complex property tiers and ensure your capital is deployed effectively.

As sponsorship competition intensifies across Formula 1, MotoGP, Formula E, IndyCar, and endurance racing, many global brands now choose to hire sports marketing consultant for motorsports sponsorships to evaluate which property type — team, driver, or series — best aligns with their business objectives, activation strategy, and long-term commercial goals.

What are the Three Motorsport Sponsorship Property Types and How Do They Differ?

A brand, before deciding which motorsport property to sponsor, must determine what each property type actually provides. You can find these three categories in aggregate.

1. Team sponsorship

Where it’s a direct commercial deal with a racing team, with details about everything from car livery placements to driver uniform branding and garage signage to hospitality rights and access to digital content, to whether you’re an official partner or not. This is the predominant and most commercially developed property type in worldwide motorsport.

2) Sponsorship of drivers

A personal endorsement and commercial arrangement with a single driver, which also involves helmet, race suit and personal social media branding, and may include ambassador rights and appearance obligations. Deals with drivers may be made at the same or separate teams.

3) Series sponsorship

A partnership at the championship level, not with any team or driver. This is where a series partner benefits from exposure in each of its competitors, all the events and official broadcast and digital channels for the championship, not a single team, no matter how it might fare. This series of motorsport brand partnership options all meet different strategic needs.

The right choice depends on what the brand wants to achieve, budget, risk appetite, and the kind of commercial relationship desired. Selecting the wrong type of property, even the right type in the correct series, is one of the most frequent and expensive mistakes any US brand makes entering motorsport.

Head-to-Head Comparison: Team vs Driver vs Series Sponsorship

Factor	Team Sponsorship	Driver Sponsorship	Series Sponsorship
Typical entry cost (F1)	$1M–$30M+ per season	$60K–$5M per season	$5M–$150M+ per season
Asset scope	Livery, suits, garage, hospitality, digital	Helmet, race suit, personal social, appearances	Broadcast graphics, trophies, events, all venues
Audience reach	One team’s fanbase + broadcast	Driver’s personal audience + social followers	All fans of the championship globally
On-track performance risk	High team results affect visibility	Medium driver results + team position	Low championship always in focus
Category exclusivity	Within the team	Personal to the driver	Series-wide (broadest protection)
Activation depth	Deepest technical partnerships possible	Medium ambassador-led content	Broad event and hospitality-focused
Portability	Low tied to team	High follows driver across teams	N/A tied to championship
Best for	B2B brands, tech, finance, premium positioning	Consumer brands, lifestyle, targeted reach	Global consumer brands, official suppliers
US brand entry viability	High (mid-market to enterprise)	Very high (accessible price points)	Enterprise-level budgets only
Brand association type	Engineering, performance, team identity	Personality, aspiration, individual narrative	Prestige, global scale, category leadership

Why Choose a Team Sponsorship for Your Brand?

F1 team sponsorship options are the most common entry point for US brands. When you sponsor a team, you become part of the "engineering family." This is best where the brands require showing how their product can perform under pressure.

Key Advantages:

• Technical Validation: Tech companies such as Oracle and HP engage in team relationships to demonstrate their AI and cloud.
• Hospitality Access: The access to the Garage Tours and Paddock Club is controlled by teams and is an important part of B2B networking.
• All-season Visibility: Your logo will remain on the car throughout the season, even when one driver is in place of another.

Is a Racing Driver Sponsorship Deal Better for Social Media ROI?

The racing driver sponsorship deal is usually more flexible than the team deal. F1 has 40% of its Instagram followers aged below 25 in 2025. Drivers are now regarded as global creators/influencers, and not just athletes.

F1 driver sponsorship for brands allows for:

• Human Connection: This is because a fan finds it easier to associate with a human being than with a machine.
• Flexible Content: Drivers have the freedom to record TikTok behind-the-scenes content that teams may be too limited to create.
• Reduced Cost of Entry: A team title deal would cost us at least 100M, whereas a personal endorsement with an up-and-coming star can begin at a significantly lower price.

What is the Right Time to Have a Racing Series Sponsorship or Team Sponsorship?

Sponsorship of the racing series or the team sponsorship is an issue that often ends with the question of Category Control. When you are a multinational logistics company such as DHL or an airline such as Qatar Airways, you would not wish to be bound to the performance of a single team. You would like to be the official partner of the whole circus.

Top Series Sponsorship Applications:

• Clean Branding: Series partners usually receive Trackside Signage (boards along the track), which can be seen no matter which car is on screen.
• Official Designation: You may use the series logo (e.g., the F1 "F" logo) on your packaging around the world.
• Neutrality: You do not lose fans of other teams. You are not a fan of Ferrari or Red Bull; you are a fan of the sport.

How a Sponsorship Property Selection Consultant Mitigates Risk

The motorsport brand partnership options environment can be a legal minefield for a US brand. This is where a sponsorship property selection consultant comes in to offer value. They are a specialist in auditing the actual value of each asset as an independent motorsport sponsorship agency in the USA.

Consultants help you avoid common pitfalls, such as:

• Conflicting Rights: Having your driver as your personal shoe supplier does not conflict with the apparel partner of the team.
• Regional Strategy: An IndyCar team sponsorship might be more effective for a brand with a 90% US-based customer base than an F1 deal.
• Performance Clauses: Protecting your investment if a driver leaves the team or if the team falls significantly in the championship standings.

Picking the Right Property for 2026 and Beyond

Navigating motorsport sponsorship property types is no longer a guessing game; it is a data-led science. As we approach the 2026 regulations, where Cadillac and other major US entities will join the grid, the demand for F1 team sponsorship options will only intensify.

Whether you choose the technical depth of a team, the social influence of a driver, or the global authority of a series partnership, your choice must align with your long-term KPIs. A specialized motorsport sponsorship agency in the USA can ensure that your brand isn't just "on the car," but is actively driving business growth.