1992 SEMI-FINAL RESULTS:
Thank you for your participation in the Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Project. If you are unaware of what that is, we acted like the PFHOF had its first class in January 1946.
We have completed the years up to 1991.
For “1992,” a Preliminary Vote with nearly 100 players whose playing career ended by 1986. We also follow the structure in which players have 20 years of eligibility, and if they do not make it into the Hall, they are relegated to the Senior Pool.
Each voter was asked to select 25 names from the preliminary list, and the top 25 vote-getters were named Semi-Finalists.
A week later, the voters were asked to pick 15 names from the 25 Semi-Finalists, and next week, they will choose five from the remaining 15. We will continue this process every week until we catch up to the current year.
32 votes were cast, with the top 15 advancing.
This is for the “Modern Era”
Bold indicates they advanced to the Finals:
|
Player |
Year of Eligibility |
Vote Total |
|
Tom Mack G |
9 |
26 |
|
Dave Casper TE |
3 |
25 |
|
Jackie Smith TE |
9 |
23 |
|
Lynn Swann WR |
5 |
23 |
|
Randy Gradishar LB |
4 |
23 |
|
Dave Wilcox LB |
13 |
21 |
|
Elvin Bethea DE |
4 |
21 |
|
Joe DeLamielleure G |
2 |
21 |
|
Bob Griese QB |
7 |
20 |
|
Robert Brazile LB |
3 |
20 |
|
Charlie Joiner WR |
1 |
18 |
|
John Riggins RB-FB |
2 |
19 |
|
Jan Stenerud PK |
2 |
16 |
|
L.C. Greenwood DE |
6 |
15 |
|
Ray Guy P |
1 |
15 |
|
Dick LeBeau DB |
15 |
14 |
|
Ken Stabler QB |
3 |
14 |
|
Gino Cappelletti FL-SE-DB-WR-K |
17 |
13 |
|
Tommy Nobis LB |
11 |
13 |
|
Claude Humphrey DE |
6 |
13 |
|
Ken Anderson QB |
1 |
12 |
|
Dave Robinson LB |
13 |
11 |
|
Chris Hanburger LB |
9 |
11 |
|
Bob Kuechenberg G-T-C |
4 |
11 |
|
Cliff Branch WR |
2 |
11 |
|
Roger Brown DT |
18 |
9 |
This is for the “Senior Era”
*Bold indicates they advanced to the Finals:
|
Player |
Year of Eligibility |
Vote Total |
|
Joe Fortunato LB |
1 |
20 |
|
Pete Retzlaff E-HB-TE |
1 |
19 |
|
Pat Harder FB |
14 |
12 |
|
Marshall Goldberg FB |
19 |
11 |
|
Ward Cuff WB-QB-HB |
20 |
8 |
|
Alan Ameche FB |
7 |
12 |
|
Billy Wilson E |
7 |
6 |
|
None of the Above |
1 |
This is for the “Coaches/Contributors Era”
*Bold indicates they advanced to the Finals:
|
Player |
Year of Eligibility |
Vote Total |
|
COACH: Tom Landry |
2 |
31 |
|
OWNER: Wellington Mara |
6 |
17 |
|
SCOUT: Gil Brandt |
1 |
13 |
|
OWNER: Ralph Wilson |
1 |
11 |
|
OWNER: Tex Schramm |
12 |
10 |
We will post the Class of 1992 Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Project next Saturday.
Thank you to all who contributed. If you want to be part of this project, please let us know!
Crypto casinos are reshaping how people play online. Picking the right cryptocurrency can make a huge difference in your experience. The coin you choose affects transaction speed, fees, and whether your bankroll stays stable or fluctuates wildly while you're mid-game.
Dozens of cryptocurrencies exist, but three dominate the online casino space: Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Tether (USDT). Each has unique strengths and trade-offs. This guide compares them head-to-head across the factors that matter most: cost, speed, volatility, platform support, and ease of use. By the end, you'll know exactly which crypto fits your playing style.
Let's break it down.
Bitcoin is the most widely accepted cryptocurrency at online casinos. Walk into any crypto casino site, and you'll find BTC support front and center. Casinos like JB.com, BiggerZ.com and nearly every other operator accept Bitcoin deposits and withdrawals, making it the default choice for millions of players worldwide.
Why does Bitcoin hold this position? Simple. It was first, it's trusted, and it's everywhere.
Players who prioritize platform compatibility, want access to the largest bonuses, and are comfortable with price fluctuations.
Ethereum brings more to the table than just payment processing. Its smart contract functionality powers decentralized casinos, provably fair games, and NFT-based reward systems. ETH is the second most accepted crypto at online casinos, and its technical capabilities open doors that Bitcoin can't.
If you're interested in playing on decentralized platforms or want faster transaction times than Bitcoin, Ethereum deserves your attention.
Players who value faster transactions, want access to decentralized casino platforms, or plan to use Ethereum-based dApps and provably fair games.
Tether (USDT) is a stablecoin pegged 1:1 to the US dollar. Your $100 deposit stays worth $100 when you're ready to withdraw, no matter what happens in the crypto market. This stability makes USDT the go-to choice for players who want predictability.
If you've ever deposited Bitcoin, watched the price drop 8% during your session, and then cashed out less than you started with (despite winning), you understand the appeal of stablecoins.
Players who want a stable, dollar-equivalent bankroll with low fees (especially on TRC-20) and prefer to keep gambling and investing as separate activities.
Here's the breakdown in table form:
|
Factor |
BTC |
ETH |
USDT |
|
Casino Acceptance |
Highest (near-universal) |
Very high |
High and growing |
|
Transaction Speed |
~10 min (on-chain) |
~12 sec (L1) |
Near-instant (TRC-20) |
|
Average Fees |
$1–$5 |
Variable ($0.50–$5+) |
Near-zero (TRC-20) |
|
Price Volatility |
High |
High |
None (pegged to USD) |
|
Bonus Availability |
Largest offers |
Moderate |
Growing USDT bonuses |
|
Smart Contracts |
Limited |
Yes (dApps, provably fair) |
No |
|
Best For |
Maximum compatibility |
dApps & speed |
Bankroll stability |
The "best" coin depends entirely on what matters most to you. No single answer fits every player.
Making the right choice comes down to your priorities. Here's a quick decision guide:
Pro tip: Many experienced players use a combination. USDT for day-to-day play (stable value, low fees) and BTC or ETH for platforms that offer better bonuses on those coins. You can switch between them based on the situation.
Whichever coin you pick, verify the casino supports it, check network and fee details, and never send funds on the wrong network. One wrong click can mean lost money with no way to recover it.
Q: Can I use more than one cryptocurrency at the same casino?
A: Yes, most crypto casinos support multiple coins. You can deposit in one and withdraw in another if the platform allows it.
Q: Which crypto has the lowest fees for casino deposits?
A: USDT on the TRC-20 (Tron) network typically has near-zero transaction fees, making it the cheapest option.
Q: Will my Bitcoin deposit lose value while I play?
A: It can. BTC is volatile, so your deposit may increase or decrease in value during your session. Use USDT if you want to avoid this risk.
Yes, we know that this is taking a while!
As many of you know, we at Notinhalloffame.com are slowly generating the top 50 of each major North American sports team. That being said, we maintain and update our existing Top 50 lists annually. As such, we are delighted to present our pre-2026 revision of our top 50 Chicago Cubs.
As for all of our top 50 players in baseball, we look at the following:
1. Duration and Impact.
2. Traditional statistics and how they finished in the Major League Baseball.
3. Advanced Statistics.
4. Playoff performance.
5. Their respective legacy on the team.
6. How successful the team was when he was there.
7. Respecting the era in which they played.
Criteria 1-4 will make up the lion’s share of the algorithm. Please note that we have implemented this for the first time. This has changed the rankings all throughout the board.
Last year, the White Sox were awful, winning only 60 Games. None of the active players made a debut on the Top 50, nor were there any active players on the list.
As always, we present our top five, which saw a slight change.
1. Frank Thomas
2. Ed Walsh
3. Luke Appling
4. Ted Lyons
5. Red Faber
You can find the entire list here.
The new algorithm has led us to revise the list, with the most notable change in the top five, where Ed Walsh and Luke Appling flipped spots.
We thank you for your continued support of our lists on Notinhalloffame.com.
Last January, the Baseball Hall of Fame announced the Class of 2026, and for us at Notinhalloffame.com, this means it is time to revise the list of those to consider for the Hall.
At present, it is a work in progress, as we have multiple projects underway (including prepping the ballot for the 2026 United States Athletic Hall of Fame), but we are also slowly working on the Baseball Hall revision.
Our revisions take into account the following:
Simple, right?
As this is a work in progress, the section is under construction, but we will keep you apprised of the changes as we go.
The entire list (again, it is under construction) is here, but in the meantime, here is the revised 31-40:
31. Buster Posey (Debut)
32. Stan Hack
33. David Cone
34. Graig Nettles
35. Bill Freehan
36. Dave Stieb
37. Kevin Brown
38. Bob Caruthers
39. Andy Pettitte
40. Allie Reynolds
Look for more updates soon.
I own and run three sites, one of which is the United States Athletic Hall of Fame. The USAHOF is a grassroots organization designed to honor the greatest American Athletes of all time.
Thus far, we have completed three years of inductions. The way it works is that we have a committee of sportswriters and athletes who help us decide which athletes should be on the ballot. A ballot is provided to the committee with 125 athletes, and the top 25 advance to the public ballot. This is online for six months, and the top 25 athletes (along with five coaches, contributors, and broadcasters).
I am seeking to expand the athletes who help us with the voting process.
It would only take roughly ten minutes of your time, and is all done digitally. We would then ask your permission to use your name as one of the committee members.
Our site is www.theusahof.com, and please let me know if you are interested or have any questions.
Looking forward to hearing back from you!
Kirk