gold star for USAHOF
Site Admin

Site Admin

24. Tony Mullane

How many people pointed at Bert Blyleven’s 287 career wins year after year and championed his Hall of Fame cause?  We don’t know the exact number, but we are sure that it is a lot more than those who created logs extolling the virtues of Tony Mullane’s 284 Major League victories.

Maybe people should marvel at those wins.  Mullane was an ambidextrous hurler who could easily baffle batters, as back in his day, pitchers did not wear gloves, thus they had no idea which arm he would throw with.  Mullane was an innings-eater who recorded 30 wins on multiple occasions.  Like many in his day, Mullane was a very much a free spirit who challenged the reserve clause, was suspended for the 1885 season, and sat out part of the 1892 season in protest over pay cuts.  This may have cost him the magical 300-win number, and the fact that he played in the American Association (and not the National League) and had subpar seasons late in his career has made the switch-pitching Tony Mullane a distant afterthought among the folks at Cooperstown.

Should Tony Mullane be in the Hall of Fame?

Definitely put him in! - 69.6%
Maybe, but others deserve it first. - 19.6%
Probably not, but it wouldn't be the end of the world. - 5.4%
No opinion. - 1.1%
No way! - 4.3%

77. Willie Randolph

It is strange to say that Willie Randolph played in a bit of a shadow as he was a long-time Yankee, but that is somewhat true.  He was in the shadow of other more flamboyant New York stars, and his strong defensive play never got him a Gold Glove as he played at the same time as Lou Whitaker or Frank White.  Hell, even his current Coaching career seems to overshadow his accomplishments on the diamond.  It shouldn’t, though, as Willie Randolph was a very good ballplayer.

Willie Randolph may have been a multi-time AAll-Star but it was many of the little things that got him there.  He showed incredible patience at the plate and drew many free passes to help set the table for his squad’s power hitters.  He was an excellent fielder and a clubhouse leader.  He may not have been an offensive juggernaut, but he was a consistent performer and often the most reliable.

Randolph did not receive an abundant amount of support for the Hall of Fame, but the Bronx faithful remember him as one of the better players in their history.  Considering the New York Yankees' history, this is indeed high praise.

Should Willie Randolph be in the Hall of Fame?

Definitely put him in! - 52.9%
Maybe, but others deserve it first. - 16.8%
Probably not, but it wouldn't be the end of the world. - 21%
No opinion. - 0%
No way! - 9.2%

41. Will Clark

Will Clark is a justifiable member of the Mississippi Sports and College Baseball Hall of Fame, but it looks like the big one in Cooperstown will elude him as he failed to get past his first year of eligibility.  A look at his career makes you wonder why he couldn’t get past that elusive first ballot.

Nicknamed “The Thrill”, Will Clark became an instant favorite as he homered on his first at-bat against the legendary Nolan Ryan.  Clark would become a major star in the Bay Area, exciting fans with his unequaled competitiveness and solid offensive play.  He was ranked among his peers as the top clutch performer in the game, as evidenced by his 1989 NLCS MVP.  The six-Time All-Star finished his career with a Batting Average over .300 and solid power numbers.  What hurt Will Clark was that the inflated power numbers that came after him (especially from other first basemen) made what he accomplished look less special.  It is very possible that “The Thrill” could pop up in a Veterans’ Committee discussion in the future.

Should Will Clark be in the Hall of Fame?

Definitely put him in! - 71.8%
Maybe, but others deserve it first. - 17.9%
Probably not, but it wouldn't be the end of the world. - 4.7%
No opinion. - 0%
No way! - 5.6%

66. George Van Haltren

One of the main staples of this website is to discuss the overlooked.  We certainly are not the only ones to do this, as other websites and blogs discuss those they feel are Hall of Fame-worthy, but no matter how you slice it, it is hard to find anyone with more HOF credentials who has been completely abandoned than George Van Haltren.

A star of the last decade of the 1800’s, Van Haltren was a hitting machine who slapped away at singles like they were mosquitoes.  He was constantly in the top ten in multiple Batting categories, and he was a huge asset with his glove, as he led the league three times in outfield assists.  In addition, he could be called upon to pitch when needed and actually finished his career with a respectable won-loss record of 40- 31.  With over 2,500 career hits and 1,600 career runs, how is it possible that he is not even on the radar?

Should George Van Haltren be in the Hall of Fame?

Definitely put him in! - 77.8%
Maybe, but others deserve it first. - 16%
Probably not, but it wouldn't be the end of the world. - 1.2%
No opinion. - 0%
No way! - 4.9%