Just what would Keith Hernandez be most famous for? Could it be for his eleven consecutive Gold Gloves? How about his 1979 MVP? The two World Series rings, perhaps? Maybe his tenacious play as a Met? It could also be for his association with cocaine. Likely, many think of Keith Hernandez and remember that Seinfeld episode instead. Just as long as it isn’t for those terrible Just for Men commercials.
Although Keith Hernandez had a longer tenure with the Cardinals and won a World Series and MVP there, it can be easily argued that his best days were as a New York Met. He embodied the party hard, play harder attitude, and quickly became the leader of his second franchise. Hernandez did not just win Gold Gloves; he reinvented the position. It was virtually impossible to bunt on him, and his judgments on the field were rarely wrong. Hernandez was not a power hitter, but a very good contact hitter, and showed a high On Base Percentage when it wasn’t the vogue statistic to have.
What has hampered Hernandez’s Hall of Fame case was the allegations in St. Louis that he was not a hustler (mostly made by his manager, Whitey Herzog) and was a drug abuser. The latter proved to be true, though the former was accurate as well; it can only be imagined what numbers he would have put up. Keith Hernandez likely left the ballot after nine years because of those issues, but with the recent surge of sabermetrics, a look at Keith Hernandez should make him an interesting case for future consideration.
If the main criteria for the Hall are perseverance and effort, then Rusty Staub should have been a first-ballot Hall of Famer. His hard work resulted in over 2,700 hits in a Major League career that many people who saw him early on would never have pegged him for.
Nobody could ever accuse Staub of not giving everything he had, regardless of the endeavor. Those efforts included cooking, history, and, of course, baseball. They called him eccentric for these things, but his meticulous nature turned him into a pure hitter and gained him respect throughout the league. He made six All-Star Games but did so without showing much power (though he hit 25 homers twice) and without any real speed. What he did do was hit for average consistently and walk frequently, which enabled him, even late in his career, to be a solid pinch-hitter.
Staub may have been freakishly consistent, but he was never dominant and was never a serious contender for any postseason award. Six All-Star appearances were impressive, but rarely has the Baseball Hall of Fame rewarded longevity without at least a flash of immortality. If they did, Staub would be a good place to start.
Should Rusty Staub be in the Hall of Fame?
David Cone may not be best remembered for winning a Cy Young Award. He may be best known as a true hired gun that baseball teams coveted in their stretch drives.
Cone had the coveted label as a big game pitcher. Cone was at his best during high-pressure situations and showcased his abilities as a member of five World Series-winning teams. He was a very smart pitcher who used a variety of skills to defeat opposing batters. Cone was the subject of various sex scandals, yet was able to shut out those distractions and often had his best outings while the target of public ridicule. As such, he shook off those labels and kept only one: winner.
What prevented David Cone from making a serious run at the Hall of Fame was a few bad seasons that really brought down his overall career numbers. He failed to make the 200-win milestone, though had he had more offensive run support, he could have made it. His “hired gun” status also gave him a label that was unsatisfactory to some, though he was one of many to receive it. Flat out, David Cone was one of the top pitchers of the ’90s, and that should not be denied.
One of the more consistent hitters in his era, Carlos Delgado was only named to two All-Star teams due to the glut of top-tier first basemen in his time. He had great power numbers (473 Home Runs and 1,512 Runs Batted In) and a very good career OPS of .929, which sounds like Hall of Fame numbers, but his career WAR of 44.3, although good, is not on par with many of the current players they are looking at.
You would think it would be hard to rank a Pitcher who once lost 20 games in a season on a list for Hall of Fame consideration. Actually, it wasn’t that hard at all.
In the year that Jerry Koosman lost twenty games, his stat lines were actually decent. In fact, he led the National League in Strikeouts per Nine Innings that season; however, the run support that he received from his woeful Mets was virtually non-existent. It wasn’t always that way, as he was the lefty half of a powerful combination (with Tom Seaver) that propelled the “Miracle Mets” to the 1969 World Series. Considered to be the best lefty that the Mets ever had, Koosman won 140 games for them, which was impressive considering that New York was not particularly good for half of that tenure. With what was perceived as an up-and-down season, Koosman was resurrected in Minnesota and won 20 games, making a solid charge for the Cy Young, but again, he was saddled with a mediocre team, this time one out of the National spotlight.
Jerry Koosman was a very good pitcher who always seemed to be in the shadow of (Seaver) or in a small market. Sabremetrically, his career has enjoyed a better look (Career WAR of 58.8), but it probably won’t be enough to get him a serious look on a Veteran’s Committee Ballot. At least Mets fans knew how good Koosman really was.