Yes, we know that this is taking a while!

As many of you know, we at Notinhalloffame.com are slowly generating the top 50 of each major North American sports team. That being said, we maintain and update our existing Top 50 lists annually.  As such, we are delighted to present our post-2024 revision of our top 50 Jacksonville Jaguars.

As for all of our top 50 players in football, we look at the following: 

1.  Advanced Statistics.

2.  Traditional statistics and how they finished in the National Football League.

3.  Playoff accomplishments.

4.  Their overall impact on the team and other intangibles that are not reflected in a stat sheet.

Last year, the Jaguars were terrible, winning only four Games, but regardless, there were three elevations on this year’s Top 50.

As always, we present our top five, which remain unchanged.

1. Jimmy Smith
2. Fred Taylor
3. Tony Boselli
4. Mark Brunell
5. Maurice Jones-Drew

You can find the entire list here 

Linebacker Josh Hines-Allen went to #28 from #43.

Quarterback Trevor Lawrence climbed to #33 from #40.

Cam Robinson, who is now with the Minnesota Vikings, moved up one slot to #46.

We thank you for your continued support of our lists on Notinhalloffame.com.

1981 SEMI-FINAL RESULTS:

Thank you for your participation in the Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Project. If you are unaware of what that is, we acted like the PFHOF had its first class in January 1946.

We have completed the years up to 1980.

For “1981,” a Preliminary Vote with nearly 100 players whose playing career ended by 1975. We are also following the structure, where players have 20 years of eligibility, and if they do not make it into the Hall, they are relegated to the Senior Pool.

Each voter was asked to select 25 names from the preliminary list, and the top 25 vote-getters were named Semi-Finalists.

A week later, the voters were asked to pick 15 names from the 25 Semi-Finalists, and next week, they will pick five from the remaining 15. We will continue this process every week until we catch up to the current year.

30 Votes took place, with the top fifteen advancing.

This is for the “Modern Era”

Bold indicates they advanced to the Finals: 

This is for the “Senior Era”

*Bold indicates they advanced to the Finals:

This is for the “Coaches/Contributors Era”

*Bold indicates they advanced to the Finals:

We will post the Class of 1980 Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Project next Saturday.

Thank you to all who contributed. If you want to be part of this project, please let us know!

It is with great pleasure that we have brought back the Notinhalloffame MLB Regular Cup, and let us explain how this works:

For every regular-season game, we anointed the top five players with the most points, in descending order: 5-4-3-2-1. 

We know the following:

• The top players for the MLB NIHOF Cup are not always the best in the league, as injuries keep players out of games, and a premium on staying healthy can help pile up points. It also does not hurt to be a top player on an average or mediocre team, as they can amass Cup points more easily than elite players on loaded squads.
• In Baseball, it is more common than in Basketball and Hockey for a player to accrue points with a single Home Run in a game, which favors position players. Starting Pitchers have a hard time with approximately 30-35 Starts and throwing fewer innings than previous generations. This is also true for closers not made for this process.
• Please remember that this is NOT necessarily who we think were the best players this year and does not reflect overall consistency. Treat this the way we did: as a fun process and more of a compilation of temporary statistical domination.

Here is the current top ten after games concluded on July 24.

1. Aaron Judge, New York Yankees: 156 Cup Points in 102 Games. (#1 Last Week).  6.9 bWAR, 90 Runs, 129 Hits, 37 Home Runs, 84 Runs Batted In, .345/.453/.717 Slash Line, 1.169 OPS & 221 OPS+.

2. Shohei Ohtani, Los Angeles Dodgers:  132 Cup Points in 101 Games.  (#2 Last Week).  4.7 bWAR, 97 Runs, 108 Hits, 37 Home Runs, 70 Runs Batted In, .273/.377/.620 Slash Line, .997 OPS & 176 OPS+.

3. Pete Alonso, New York Mets: 130 Cup Points in 103 Games. (#2 Last Week).   2.8 bWAR, 54 Runs, 104 Hits, 22 Home Runs, 80 Runs Batted In, .272/.366/.512 Slash Line, .885 OPS & 153 OPS+.

4. Manny Machado, San Diego Padres: 118 Cup Points in 103 Games. (#7 Last Week).   2.9 bWAR, 61 Runs, 114 Hits, 19 Home Runs, 63 Runs Batted In, .289/.349/.494 Slash Line, .842 OPS & 133 OPS+.

5. Cal Raleigh, Seattle Mariners: 117 Cup Points in 100 Games. (#4 Last Week).   5.3 bWAR, 69 Runs, 95 Hits, 39 Home Runs, 84 Runs Batted In, .256/.370/.615 Slash Line, .985 OPS & 183 OPS+.

6. Bobby Witt Jr., Kansas City Royals: 113 Cup Points in 102 Games. (#5 Last Week).  4.3 bWAR, 60 Runs, 116 Hits, 14 Home Runs, 56 Runs Batted In, .288/.339/.489 Slash Line, .827 OPS & 131 OPS+.

7. Riley Greene, Detroit Tigers:  112 Cup Points in 101 Games.  (#6 Last Week).  2.6 bWAR, 55 Runs, 109 Hits, 25 Home Runs, 79 Runs Batted In, .279/.327/.529 Slash Line, .856 OPS & 134 OPS+.

8. Jose Ramirez, Cleveland Guardians:  108 Cup Points in 99 Games.  (Not in the Top Ten Last Week).  4.3 bWAR, 62 Runs, 110 Hits, 21 Home Runs, 56 Runs Batted In, .297/.372/.530 Slash Line, .902 OPS & 148 OPS+.

9. Francisco Lindor, New York Mets: 107 Cup Points in 101 Games. (#8 Last Week).   2.7 bWAR, 65 Runs, 101 Hits, 19 Home Runs, 57 Runs Batted In, .248/.315/.431 Slash Line, .746 OPS & 114 OPS+.

10. Kyle Schwarber, Philadelphia Phillies: 105 Cup Points in 102 Games.  (Not in the Top Ten Last Week).  3.3 bWAR, 72 Runs, 94 Hits, 34 Home Runs, 78 Runs Batted In, .250/.376/.564 Slash Line, .940 OPS & 154 OPS+.

Minnesota’s Byron Buxton and the New York Mets’ Juan Soto fell out of the Top Ten.

Notably, 992 baseball players have earned at least 1 point, up from 977 last week.

Basketball is constantly evolving, and so is the way players train. While the flash and flair of American basketball dominate highlight reels, a quieter revolution is happening across gyms worldwide: the rise of European-style basketball training. From Luka Dončić to Nikola Jokić, some of the NBA’s brightest stars are products of the European system, and it’s not a coincidence. This unique approach focuses on fundamentals, teamwork, and all-around development, making it a blueprint for the next generation of players. It highlights the value of structured training, compelling many aspiring athletes to Train With Experts At A Top Basketball Academy. But what exactly distinguishes European training from others? Let’s break down why this method is fast becoming the secret weapon for tomorrow’s basketball stars.

Fundamentals Come First

In European basketball, players are taught from a young age that fundamentals are everything. Unlike some American systems that emphasize athleticism or scoring first, European training builds a foundation rooted in precision and accuracy. Footwork, passing, shooting mechanics, and court awareness are prioritized over flashy moves. Players are taught how to play the right way before they worry about dunk contests or viral step-backs.

This focus on basics creates smarter, more efficient players who understand the game on a deeper level. It’s why European players often excel in the NBA when it comes to decision-making and basketball IQ. Coaches in Europe stress the importance of making the right pass, moving without the ball, and setting proper screens. These habits become second nature, giving players a distinct advantage in high-pressure situations.

Versatility Is Non-Negotiable

European-style training emphasizes versatility in players, regardless of their position. In the U.S., it’s common to see kids get labeled early as point guards, big men, or shooters. In Europe, players are trained to do a bit of everything. A center learns to dribble, pass, and shoot from long range. A guard learns to post up and defend bigger players. This creates well-rounded athletes who can adapt to different game situations.

Take Nikola Jokić as a prime example. He is a 7-foot guard who plays like a point guard and sees the floor like one. His game is a direct result of European training that allowed him to develop multiple skills, not just those typical for his size. This level of versatility is exactly what modern basketball demands.

Team Play Over Hero Ball

One of the most significant differences between European and American basketball training is the emphasis on team play. In Europe, the game is taught as a collaborative effort. Players are expected to pass, cut, and work together to create scoring opportunities. Isolation plays and one-on-one heroics are kept to a minimum, especially at the youth level.

This approach creates players who are comfortable in structured systems and who understand spacing, timing, and ball movement. Coaches teach athletes how to read the game, not just react to it. As a result, European players tend to blend seamlessly into team dynamics, making them valuable assets on any roster.

Mental Toughness and Game Intelligence

European basketball training doesn’t just develop physical skills; it also builds mental strength. Players are taught to remain calm under pressure, focus on strategy, and adapt to various playing styles. Since European leagues often have older, more experienced competition, young players learn quickly how to hold their own against seasoned veterans.

This exposure creates a maturity level that often exceeds expectations when European players transition to the NBA. They are used to facing complex defenses, handling adversity, and thinking critically during games. It’s not just about talent; it’s about learning how to win.

Training for Longevity, Not Just Highlights

Many European basketball programs are designed with long-term growth in mind. Instead of pushing young players to burn out early chasing immediate success, the focus is on steady development. Coaches emphasize consistency, injury prevention, and skill refinement over time. This patience often results in players who peak later but last longer in their careers.

This method reduces the risk of overtraining and injury at a young age, keeping players healthier and more prepared for professional competition. It also prevents the development of bad habits that can form when young athletes are rushed through the system too quickly, underscoring the importance of choosing to Train With Experts At A Top Basketball Academy for long-term development.

Final Thoughts: The Future of Basketball Is Global

As basketball becomes increasingly global, the distinction between American and European training styles is beginning to blur. Many U.S. programs are now adopting European techniques, realizing that building smarter, more versatile players is the key to long-term success. Tomorrow’s basketball stars will likely be hybrids, athletes who combine American athleticism with European fundamentals. If you’re a young player, coach, or parent looking to prepare for the future of the game, paying attention to European-style training in a basketball academy isn’t just smart; it’s essential. The path to basketball greatness is no longer about where you’re from; it’s about how you train.