gold star for USAHOF
Site Admin

Site Admin

77. Willie Randolph

It is strange to say that Willie Randolph played in a bit of a shadow as he was a long-time Yankee, but that is somewhat true.  He was in the shadow of other more flamboyant New York stars, and his strong defensive play never got him a Gold Glove as he played at the same time as Lou Whitaker or Frank White.  Hell, even his current Coaching career seems to overshadow his accomplishments on the diamond.  It shouldn’t, though, as Willie Randolph was a very good ballplayer.

Willie Randolph may have been a multi-time AAll-Star but it was many of the little things that got him there.  He showed incredible patience at the plate and drew many free passes to help set the table for his squad’s power hitters.  He was an excellent fielder and a clubhouse leader.  He may not have been an offensive juggernaut, but he was a consistent performer and often the most reliable.

Randolph did not receive an abundant amount of support for the Hall of Fame, but the Bronx faithful remember him as one of the better players in their history.  Considering the New York Yankees' history, this is indeed high praise.

Should Willie Randolph be in the Hall of Fame?

Definitely put him in! - 52.9%
Maybe, but others deserve it first. - 16.8%
Probably not, but it wouldn't be the end of the world. - 21%
No opinion. - 0%
No way! - 9.2%

41. Will Clark

Will Clark is a justifiable member of the Mississippi Sports and College Baseball Hall of Fame, but it looks like the big one in Cooperstown will elude him as he failed to get past his first year of eligibility.  A look at his career makes you wonder why he couldn’t get past that elusive first ballot.

Nicknamed “The Thrill”, Will Clark became an instant favorite as he homered on his first at-bat against the legendary Nolan Ryan.  Clark would become a major star in the Bay Area, exciting fans with his unequaled competitiveness and solid offensive play.  He was ranked among his peers as the top clutch performer in the game, as evidenced by his 1989 NLCS MVP.  The six-Time All-Star finished his career with a Batting Average over .300 and solid power numbers.  What hurt Will Clark was that the inflated power numbers that came after him (especially from other first basemen) made what he accomplished look less special.  It is very possible that “The Thrill” could pop up in a Veterans’ Committee discussion in the future.

Should Will Clark be in the Hall of Fame?

Definitely put him in! - 71.8%
Maybe, but others deserve it first. - 17.9%
Probably not, but it wouldn't be the end of the world. - 4.7%
No opinion. - 0%
No way! - 5.6%

66. George Van Haltren

One of the main staples of this website is to discuss the overlooked.  We certainly are not the only ones to do this, as other websites and blogs discuss those they feel are Hall of Fame-worthy, but no matter how you slice it, it is hard to find anyone with more HOF credentials who has been completely abandoned than George Van Haltren.

A star of the last decade of the 1800’s, Van Haltren was a hitting machine who slapped away at singles like they were mosquitoes.  He was constantly in the top ten in multiple Batting categories, and he was a huge asset with his glove, as he led the league three times in outfield assists.  In addition, he could be called upon to pitch when needed and actually finished his career with a respectable won-loss record of 40- 31.  With over 2,500 career hits and 1,600 career runs, how is it possible that he is not even on the radar?

Should George Van Haltren be in the Hall of Fame?

Definitely put him in! - 77.8%
Maybe, but others deserve it first. - 16%
Probably not, but it wouldn't be the end of the world. - 1.2%
No opinion. - 0%
No way! - 4.9%

48. Larry Doyle

Another forgotten star in the pre-Babe Ruth era was Larry Doyle, who was easily amongst the most likable players of his era.  Not only was he a natural favorite, but he was also one of the most consistent players.

Larry Doyle was above average in almost every category and put together a monster 1912 campaign, during which he won the 1911 MVP.  Although he had many very good seasons, his three World Series appearances were less than stellar, and he failed to lead his team to any championship.  Had he kept to the standards he set from April to September, it could be imagined that Larry Doyle would have been a serious Hall of Fame candidate, as opposed to the remote possibility he is today.  He famously quipped that it “was good to be young and a Giant.” It would have been better to be labeled as immortal.

Should Larry Doyle be in the Hall of Fame?

Definitely put him in! - 75.7%
Maybe, but others deserve it first. - 9.5%
Probably not, but it wouldn't be the end of the world. - 8.1%
No opinion. - 0%
No way! - 6.8%