The Pro Football Hall of Fame announced the nine former Coaches who have advanced as Semi-Finalists for the Class of 2026.

The Blue Ribbon Committee will meet virtually on November 18 and select one Finalist.

*Denotes First Year of Eligibility.

*Bill Belichick.  With all due respect to this loaded group of candidates, no one can match the resume of Bill Belichick.  Beginning his coaching career as a special assistant in Baltimore, Belichick joined the New York Giants in 1979, worked his way up to Defensive Coordinator, and won two Super Bowls in that role.  He became Cleveland’s Head Coach, but he posted a winning record in only one of his six years.  He received another chance as a Head Coach for New England, and the rest was history.  Belichick ushered in the Patriots' dynasty, leading the Pats to six Super Bowl wins, nine Super Bowl appearances (both records as a Head Coach), and presided over the most remarkable run by any Head Coach associated with one team in NFL history.  Belichick had a career record of 333-178, a 31-13 playoff record, and also boasts three AP Coach of the Year Awards.  He was named to the NFL 100th Anniversary Team.

Tom Coughlin:  Coughlin worked his way up the ranks and became the Head Coach of the expansion Jacksonville Jaguars in 1995.  He was their Head Coach for eight years, bringing them to two AFC Championship Games, the first of which was in the franchise’s second year.  After being fired, he joined the New York Giants, where the stoic leader led the G-Men to two Super Bowl wins (XLII & XLVI).  He retired with an overall record of 170-150 and is already a member of the New York Giants Ring of Honor and Pride of the Jaguars.

Mike Holmgren.  Holmgren won two Super Bowls with San Francisco, first as a Quarterbacks Coach and then as their Offensive Coordinator, and it propelled him to the Head Coaching job at Green Bay in 1992.  He led the Packers to a Super Bowl win at SBXXXI.  Holmgren accepted the Seattle Seahawks coaching job and took them to a Super Bowl appearance in 2005.  A member of the Green Bay Packers Hall of Fame and Seattle Seahawks Ring of Honor, Holmgren had a career record of 161-111.

Chuck Knox:  An Offensive Line Coach with the New York Jets (1963-66) and for Detroit (1967-72), Knox was elevated to the Head Coach for the Los Angeles Rams in 1973, where he won the AP Coach of the Year award in his first season in that role.  He later coached Buffalo (1978-82) and Seattle (1983-91), where he won Coach of the Year Awards for both clubs, and he concluded his career with three years back with the Rams.  He had an overall record of 186-147.

Buddy Parker:  Parker was left off this stage last year after failing to make the Hall as a Finalist in 2024, but he is back where he belongs: in Hall of Fame consideration.  An NFL Champion as a player for the Detroit Lions in 1935, Parker became their Head Coach in 1951, and promptly led them to back-to-back NFL Championships in 1952 and 1953.  He left to helm the Pittsburgh Steelers in 1957, where he brought them to respectability.  He had a 107-76-9 record.

Dan Reeves.  Reeves won a Super Bowl as an Assistant Coach in Dallas and was hired by Denver as their Head Coach in 1981.  He led the Broncos to three AFC Titles but could not punch their ticket to a Super Bowl win.  After he was let go by Denver, he signed with the Giants and won the 1993 AP Coach of the Year.  Later, he took over as Atlanta’s Head Coach, leading them to their first Super Bowl appearance —a loss to his former team (Denver) —and earning his second Coach of the Year award.  He had an overall record of 190-165-2 and is a member of the Broncos Ring of Honor.

Marty Schottenheimer.  Working his way through the Giants and Lions as the Linebackers Coach, Schottenheimer landed the Defensive Coordinator job in Cleveland in 1980 and was promoted to their Head Coach in 1984.  He brought Cleveland to the AFC Finals twice but left for Kansas City in 1989 with another (unsuccessful) trip to the AFC Championship Game (1993).  Schottenheimer took some time off and was lured back by Washington, but that lasted only one year.  He returned the following season for the San Diego Chargers, where he twice took them to the playoffs.  He had an overall record of 200-126-1 and is a member of the Kansas City Chiefs Hall of Fame.

George Seifert.  Seifert joined the San Francisco 49ers as their Defensive Backs Coach in 1980 and was elevated to Defensive Coordinator in 1983.  He won three Super Bowls as an assistant coach, and in 1989 he was again promoted to Head Coach. Here, he led the Niners to two more Super Bowl wins and to five NFC Championship Games overall.  He concluded his career with three years as Carolina’s Head Coach and had an overall record of 114-62.

Mike Shanahan.  Shanahan joined Denver as their Wide Receivers Coach in 1984, and a year later, he began a three-year stint as their Offensive Coordinator, where he caught the eye of Raiders owner Al Davis, who hired him to replace Tom Flores.  That did not last long, and he was back in Denver but was let go due to a dispute between Quarterback John Elway and Dan Reeves.  He went to San Francisco, where he won Super Bowl XXIX as the Offensive Coordinator. He returned to Denver in 1995, leading the Broncos to their first two Super Bowl wins (XXXII & XXXIII) during a 14-year run.  He finished his career with three years at Washington, posting an overall record of 170-138.  He is also a member of the Broncos Ring of Fame.

The three coaches who were cut were Bill Arnsberger, Alex Gibbs, and Clark Shaugnessy.

We congratulate the candidates who have reached this stage.

What a player Derrick White has become for the Boston Celtics!

Traded from the San Antonio Spurs in early 2022, White became an instant fan favorite in Boston, for his high-intelligence court skills, expert passing, and attention to defense, which has made him one of the most dependable “glue” players in the game; so much that a player who is not an All-Star saw considerable minutes for Team U.S.A. in the 2024 Paris Olympics.

White’s performance in France was only months after he helped the Celtics win the 2024 NBA Championship, a title that likely would not have happened without acquiring him from the Spurs.

Entering another season with Boston, White may never become an All-Star, but he is one of the most respected players in the game.

As crypto betting continues to rise in popularity, players are adapting fast—learning how to protect their funds, guard their data, and stay one step ahead of digital risks. The thrill of crypto gaming is growing, but so is the need for smart habits and secure tools. Knowing how to balance excitement with safety has become part of the modern player’s edge.

The Changing Face of Crypto Betting

As crypto betting expands, the experience itself is evolving beyond simple wagers. Modern platforms now mix technology with variety—offering everything from live sports and in-play betting to casino-style games, prediction markets, and fantasy leagues. Payment flexibility has become a hallmark, allowing deposits and withdrawals in multiple digital currencies while maintaining the fast, borderless appeal that drew players to crypto in the first place.

When exploring the best wallets to bet on sports with crypto, attention often shifts to usability and compatibility. Multi-asset wallets that integrate seamlessly with major sportsbooks help players manage funds efficiently, while hardware or non-custodial options provide stronger protection for larger balances. It’s not just about holding tokens—it’s about how easily those wallets interact with trusted platforms, processing transactions quickly and securely across different blockchains.

Features such as quick deposits, transparent fees, and conversion support have made crypto sports betting more accessible than ever. Yet, as innovation grows, so does the need for awareness. Each new feature introduces another reason to stay alert—because convenience is only valuable when paired with security.

1. Pick the Right Wallet and Protect Your Keys

Every smart crypto bettor starts with one thing — a secure wallet. Wallets generally fall into two categories: hot (online) wallets and cold (offline or hardware) wallets. Cold wallets—hardware devices kept offline—bring far stronger protection for larger sums. They are less exposed to hacks and malware, making them ideal for storing betting bankrolls or winnings long term.

It is equally important to guard private keys and seed phrases. These keys grant full access to funds, and losing or exposing them can mean permanent loss. Smart players never store them in emails, screenshots, or cloud folders.

Key actions:

• Use a hardware or offline wallet for funds not needed immediately.
• Store seed phrases in a secure physical location, away from online systems.
• Never share or copy private keys into messages, cloud storage, or unverified apps.

2. Enable Strong Account Protection

Even the best wallet can’t protect weak accounts. Enabling Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) adds a crucial layer of security beyond passwords. Every login or withdrawal request then demands verification through a second device or app.

Strong, unique passwords remain essential. Reusing passwords across sites or using easy-to-guess combinations weakens protection. Since crypto transactions are irreversible, once assets are moved without authorization, recovery is unlikely. Maintaining strict access control is therefore vital.

Key actions:

• Use a password manager to create and store unique, complex passwords.
• Enable 2FA on every betting and wallet account.
• Review login alerts and account activity regularly for suspicious behavior.

3. Choose Trusted Platforms and Check Fairness

The platform matters as much as the wallet. Not every crypto betting site follows strong regulatory or transparency standards. Selecting platforms with proper oversight, clear terms, and open operations helps protect both funds and trust.

Look for sites that use independent audits, verifiable fairness systems, and transparent payout structures. Platforms that publish their algorithms or use blockchain-verified fairness give players confidence that outcomes are legitimate and not manipulated.

Key actions:

• Verify that the platform is licensed or operates under transparent conditions.
• Check whether games are provably fair and independently tested.
• Review genuine user feedback and community discussions before depositing.

4. Stay Ahead of Scams and Phishing

In a fast-moving digital arena, awareness is the strongest defense. Most crypto threats can be avoided with a little preparation and clear judgment. Recognizing how scams and phishing attempts operate turns potential risks into opportunities to strengthen one’s security.

Legitimate platforms keep communication transparent—they never request private keys, wallet access, or personal information through random messages. Staying alert to unusual links, pop-ups, or offers helps players stay in control and protect their funds with confidence.

Key actions:

• Check all links, domains, and sender details before interacting.
• Keep software and browser extensions official and up to date.
• Use a secure connection or VPN when managing wallets or placing bets.

5. Safeguard Your Connection and Devices

Even strong passwords and trusted sites fail if the device is weak. Public Wi-Fi networks, outdated software, or unprotected hardware can expose sensitive data. Maintaining secure devices is a cornerstone of safe crypto betting.

Regular updates help fix vulnerabilities in wallets and operating systems. Using antivirus and firewall protection reduces exposure to malware. For frequent bettors, having a dedicated device for crypto-related activities can further isolate and minimize risks.

Key actions:

• Avoid making transactions over public Wi-Fi.
• Keep wallet apps, browsers, and operating systems up to date.
• Use dedicated, secure devices for crypto transactions whenever possible.

The Smart Way Forward

Crypto betting brings speed, privacy, and reach—but real confidence starts with security. By combining a reliable wallet, strong account protection, careful platform selection, awareness of scams, and secure connections, players can enjoy the thrill of crypto gaming without unnecessary risk.

In a world driven by innovation, security becomes a form of strategy. The same precision used to analyze odds or track market trends should apply to digital protection. Those who treat safety as part of their playbook gain not just peace of mind but also the freedom to focus on what truly matters—the game itself.

The landscape shifts quickly. New coins, new platforms, and fresh opportunities arrive daily. Yet amid that pace, discipline remains the winning move. Players who take time to verify, update, and double-check their setups stay ahead of trouble. Security isn’t fear. It’s control. It’s about making technology work for the player, not the other way around.

These five steps are not complicated, but they form a powerful shield against the most common threats. Staying alert and informed turns crypto betting from a gamble into a smart, secure experience. In the digital age, safety is the ultimate winning strategy.

Models trying to pin down a player’s odds of making the Hall of Fame have started to pop up in all sorts of corners of sports analytics. Teams want them. Fans too, and it wouldn’t be surprising if some players spend a night or two wondering what drives those final, mysterious decisions. Still, the reality is trickier than those outputs might suggest, statistics can hint at likely results, but when the doors close on those voting rooms, things get more complicated. 

Modern probability tools provide plenty of sophistication, yet, when it comes to induction, everything ultimately hinges on cut-and-dried thresholds and lots of subjectivity. Each method scratches the surface in different ways, but none quite reach the whole truth.

Foundations of Hall of Fame Probability Modeling

Most of the popular Hall of Fame projection tools seem to lean quite a bit on logistic regression (it’s the default, at this point). That approach munches through layers of player info, think WAR, awarded wins, whatever records, and spits out something not unlike a percentage chance, technically squeezing it between 0 and 1. Some folks branch out into machine learning, tossing in random forests or neural networks, just in case there’s a non-linear pattern hiding somewhere, which, occasionally, nudges up the prediction rates.

For example, Statitudes had Jaromir Jagr almost locked in as a future Hockey Hall of Famer. MLB? Candidates creep past the 0.5 mark more often as their trophy shelves fill, at least, that’s what the data trends toward. The usual suspects matter: longevity, steady productivity, and even which year it is. And then you’ve got the soft stuff, like nagging scandals or “intangibles.” These enter quietly, sometimes just a blip, but maybe it’s there all the same. The whole process is reminiscent of online slots, where statistical expectation plays a major role, but the mechanical system has its own inflexible outcomes.

Game Mechanics in Actual Selection

The real Hall of Fame voting, it doesn’t bend for probabilities. It’s cut-and-dry. Baseball’s BBWAA, for instance, expects at least 75% of votes for a player to get in. Voters can check off up to 10 names. Only the ones clearing that strict bar walk away with a plaque. It doesn’t matter if someone lands at 74.9%, the number might be there, but the rules stop you cold. There’s no wiggle room for those “in-between” probabilities (70%, 82%), which show up in tabular models but get ignored at the finish line. 

If you come up short, you’re out, even by a vote. Other leagues, like hockey or football, add layers, panels or committees, different cycles, but the punchline is always the same: you get in, or you don’t. That’s where the rub sits, a model says 0.8 is “overwhelmingly likely,” and meanwhile, a committee can just say, sorry, not tonight. Tension pops up at the edges, too, when a player’s just straddling that imaginary line. It’s all a bit rigid, and maybe that’s part of the drama.

Comparing Analytical Predictions and Selection Outcomes

Running the numbers with probability models gives fans and armchair analysts ammo for endless debates, so-and-so clocks in at 64%, someone else sits at 22%, and on it goes. But the selection process tosses in its own twists. A few players manage to get through after a analytical predictions and selection outcomes, suddenly, they don’t look so borderline. Others with high model marks stall out, stuck on the ballot for years. If you throw the numbers on a chart, you’ll see it: the models stretch across the full decimal spectrum, but the Hall only deals in absolutes, a yes at the league threshold, or a hard no. 

MLB’s bar at 75%? Higher than what most analysts would flag as enough for likely induction (50% pops up in research, but it’s pretty far from the actual cutoff). So, big-picture, the models can be pretty solid for rankings, but predicting the outcome year-to-year, it’s dicey. Especially when something off the field turns the tide for an entire ballot. And, come to think of it, the models themselves are only as sturdy as the history they’re built on, which gets messy whenever the rules, or the broader cultural standards, take a turn.

Dynamics, Limitations, and Evolving Standards

Making sense of Hall induction odds is a bit like playing catch with a moving target. Once the old-guard voters step aside for newer, maybe more stats-savvy folks, the benchmarks drift. The new era and small committee routes sometimes reach back and lift up overlooked players, but at the same time, they add new layers of uncertainty. Even if you train a perfect model on decades of voting, nobody can really promise that those same statistical signposts signal the future. 

Leadership, impact, off-field noise, they slip into consideration now and then, but they’re tough to quantify, let alone nail down. Researchers from Fangraphs and elsewhere have pointed out that what you don’t measure, the “omitted variables”, can skew predictions more than you’d expect. If the focus changes, or a brand-new position gets a champion, the models sometimes lag behind or guess wrong. So, the whole thing, if you step back, tends to look less like a straightforward roll of the dice and more like a living strategy board, shifting and reshaping as new generations put their stamp on the criteria.

Responsible Interpretation and Transparency

Trying to model Hall of Fame odds? It’s somewhat like considering different outcomes on slots or any game that leans into probability, you can point toward the likely outcomes, but there’s no such thing as a guarantee for what any single player will get. It’s wise not to lean too heavily on those model “certainties,” since quirks and blind spots are always hiding around the edges, and the committees running the show are anything but algorithmic. Sharing method details helps push the conversation forward, making arguments about fairness or bias a bit sharper, at least. 

At the same time, recognizing how much human unpredictability goes into the outcome is important, numbers bring clarity, sure, but they’re just one voice in a room full of unpredictable ones. Maybe the best move is to treat these models as conversation starters (and maybe useful guides), not as final word. That way, fans and candidates get insight without the sting of missing out just because the numbers seemed promising.