Yes, we know that this is taking a while!
As many of you know, we at Notinhalloffame.com are slowly generating the top 50 of each major North American sports team. That being said, we maintain and update our existing Top 50 lists annually. As such, we are delighted to present our pre-2026 revision of our top 50 Chicago Cubs.
As for all of our top 50 players in baseball, we look at the following:
1. Duration and Impact.
2. Traditional statistics and how they finished in the Major League Baseball.
3. Advanced Statistics.
4. Playoff performance.
5. Their respective legacy on the team.
6. How successful the team was when he was there.
7. Respecting the era in which they played.
Criteria 1-4 will make up the lion’s share of the algorithm. Please note that we have implemented this for the first time. This has changed the rankings all throughout the board.
Last year, the Cubs won 92 Games and went to the playoffs, though they fell to the Milwaukee Brewers in five Games in the Wild Card Series. As the team is over 100 years old but laden with young players, there were no new entrants and no movement among players who played at Wrigley last year.
As always, we present our top five, which saw a slight change.
1. Cap Anson
2. Ernie Banks
3. Ryne Sandberg
4. Ron Santo
5. Billy Williams
You can find the entire list https://www.notinhalloffame.com/baseball/top-50-baseball-players-by-franchise/top-50-chicago-cubs">here.
The new algorithm has led us to revise the list, with the most notable change in the top five, where Ernie Banks and Ryne Sandberg flipped spots.
We thank you for your continued support of our lists on Notinhalloffame.com.
As Opening Day approaches, attention around Major League Baseball shifts toward roster construction, positional battles, and how teams are shaping up for the long season ahead.
Few teams are drawing as much discussion as the Chicago Cubs, who enter the year with an intriguing blend of established stars, emerging talent, and high-upside newcomers.
For sports fans across the United States, spring training offers the first clear glimpse of how a team’s lineup and pitching staff will look once the regular season begins. Decisions made during this period can influence everything from clubhouse chemistry to expectations surrounding the upcoming campaign.
The Cubs have much of their roster settled already, particularly on the infield and in the starting lineup. Still, a handful of key questions remain, and those answers will help determine how Chicago approaches Opening Day.
The Infield: Locked, Loaded, and Gold Glove-Caliber
The Cubs’ infield stands out as one of the most stable and talented units in the National League. With multiple players coming off strong seasons and a major offseason addition, this group forms the backbone of Chicago’s lineup entering Opening Day.
Nico Hoerner continues to anchor the middle of the infield after delivering his most complete season yet. His defensive excellence and all-around contributions make him one of the most reliable players on the roster. Meanwhile, Michael Busch’s breakout offensive production provides serious power potential from the corner infield.
The biggest offseason move was the addition of Alex Bregman, whose championship experience and consistent two-way play bring another level of stability to third base.
With those pieces firmly in place, the Cubs enter the season with an infield that appears set. This group not only strengthens the lineup but also contributes significantly to the team’s defensive identity.
Pete Crow-Armstrong and the Outfield Picture
The Cubs’ outfield features both star power and intriguing depth questions. At the center of the conversation is Pete Crow-Armstrong, whose dynamic performance last season firmly established him as one of the team’s most exciting young players.
Crow-Armstrong’s combination of power, speed, and elite defense gives Chicago a true difference-maker in center field. His ability to impact the game in multiple ways makes him a cornerstone of the lineup.
Alongside him, Ian Happ and Seiya Suzuki provide veteran consistency and offensive balance. Together, the trio forms a strong starting outfield capable of contributing across every aspect of the game.
However, the picture behind them remains less settled. Several non-roster invitees continue to compete for the final outfield spot on the bench, creating one of the more intriguing competitions as Opening Day approaches.
Moisés Ballesteros: The Wildcard in the Lineup
Few players generate more intrigue this spring than Moisés Ballesteros. The young prospect enters camp with a legitimate chance to carve out a meaningful role on the Opening Day roster.
Ballesteros impressed during his limited major league appearances last season, demonstrating strong contact skills and an advanced approach at the plate. Those traits have led some analysts to project him as a potential designated hitter option once the regular season begins.
His path to playing time, however, may depend on defensive development. While Ballesteros has experience behind the plate, questions remain about his consistency in controlling the running game and limiting passed balls.
If he proves capable of contributing both offensively and defensively, the Cubs could gain additional lineup flexibility. That versatility could allow the coaching staff to rotate players more effectively across multiple positions.
The Rotation: Strength at the Top, Questions in the Middle
Chicago’s starting rotation enters the season with a blend of proven ability and emerging uncertainty. At the top of the staff, several pitchers provide the foundation for what the Cubs hope will be a competitive pitching unit.
Matthew Boyd and Shōta Imanaga headline the rotation alongside veterans who bring valuable experience to the group. Their presence helps establish stability as the season begins.
However, the middle portion of the rotation presents more questions. Young arms and newer additions must demonstrate consistency against major league lineups over an extended schedule.
Complicating matters further is the anticipated absence of Justin Steele early in the season as he continues to recover from injury.
These pitching dynamics play an important role in shaping expectations around the team. Observers following early-season projections often note how Chicago Cubs lines reflect both the rotation’s top-end talent and the uncertainty surrounding the remaining spots.
The Bullpen Battle: One Spot Remains Up for Grabs
While much of the Cubs’ roster appears settled, the bullpen still features one of the final competitions of spring training. Only a single relief spot remains undecided, creating an intense battle among several candidates.
Pitchers such as Ryan Rolison, Luke Little, Ben Brown, and Javier Assad all enter camp with legitimate cases for inclusion. Each brings a different skill set to the bullpen mix, from power arms to pitchers capable of multiple innings.
MLB narratives point out that performance during spring games will certainly matter, but roster flexibility also plays a role in the decision-making process. Minor-league option status and long-term development plans can influence which pitcher ultimately secures the final spot.
Despite this remaining uncertainty, the Cubs’ core bullpen structure appears largely intact. That stability allows the coaching staff to focus on refining roles rather than rebuilding the entire relief corps.
A Roster Taking Shape for Opening Day
As the regular season approaches, the Chicago Cubs appear closer to finalizing a roster capable of competing across a demanding schedule. The infield provides a strong defensive and offensive core, while the outfield combines established veterans with emerging talent.
Young players such as Moisés Ballesteros add unpredictability, potentially enhancing the lineup’s versatility. Meanwhile, the starting rotation continues to develop its identity as pitchers settle into defined roles.
Even the remaining roster competitions highlight the organization’s growing depth. From bullpen battles to bench positions, the Cubs possess multiple players capable of contributing throughout the season.
For fans following the team closely, the picture coming into focus suggests a club with both stability and upside as Opening Day draws near.
*Content reflects information available as of 2026/03/09; subject to change.*
There’s something exciting about riding a dirt bike that looks just as good as it performs. It's also a very personal and gratifying experience. Many bikes come from the factory with a clean but simple design. While that stock look works fine, people tend to enjoy giving their bike a little personality. Upgrading the appearance of your dirt ride is one of the easiest and most satisfying ways to make it feel like it's truly yours.
One of the most popular ways riders customize their bikes is by installing Yamaha dirt bike graphics or other brand-specific aftermarket graphics kits. Graphics kits are colorful vinyl decals designed to fit the body panels of your bike. They can instantly transform a plain-looking bike into something bold, stylish, and eye-catching. Many riders choose graphics with bright colors, race-inspired designs, or even custom numbers to create an entirely new look.
Why Appearance Matters
For many riders, their dirt bike is more than just a machine; it’s a hobby and a passion. Personalizing the look of your bike helps reflect your personality and riding style. Some riders want a sleek and aggressive design while others prefer bright colors that stand out on the track or trail.
Upgrading your bike’s appearance can also make it easier to recognize in a crowded pit area or while you're riding. When everyone has similar models, unique graphics or colors make your ride easier to spot in a crowd. Another benefit is the pride you get when your bike makes people take notice. When your bike looks great, you may feel more motivated to take care of it. Cleaning, maintaining, and protecting it become part of the fun rather than extra chores.
Graphics Kits: A Simple But Effective Transformation
Graphics kits are usually the first upgrade riders choose because they're affordable and simple to install. Most kits include decals for the fenders, shrouds, swingarm, and number plates. Once applied, they instantly give your bike a fresh, custom appearance.
Modern graphics are made from durable vinyl that's designed to handle mud, dust, water, and sunlight. They also help protect the plastic panels underneath from scratches and fading. In other words, they don’t just look good; they also help preserve your bike.
Small Details That Make a Big Difference
Beyond graphics, several smaller upgrades can improve your dirt bike’s appearance. These changes may seem minor, but together, they can create a big visual impact. Colored parts are one of the easiest options. Items like grips, levers, valve caps, and brake line covers come in many colors. Matching these pieces to your graphics can create a coordinated, professional look.
Seat covers are another popular upgrade. Many riders replace their stock seat cover with one that has textured material, bright colors, or stitched patterns. Those covers not only look better but can also improve your grip on the seat while you're riding. Even simple things like fresh plastics can make an older bike look brand new. Over time, dirt bike plastics can become faded, scratched, or stained. Replacing them with a new set instantly refreshes the entire bike.
Keeping Your Bike Looking Great
Once you’ve upgraded your bike’s appearance, keeping it clean will help maintain that fresh look. After a ride, washing off mud, debris, fuel, and oil prevents stains and protects decals. Using gentle cleaners and soft brushes can keep plastics and graphics looking new for longer. It’s also a good idea to check graphics for peeling or bubbles. Pressing them down early can help them stay attached and last longer.
Adding Style and Personality to Your Ride
Upgrading your dirt bike’s appearance doesn’t have to require expensive parts or complicated work. Simple changes like graphics, colored accessories, or new plastics can completely transform how your bike looks. Best of all, customization lets you create a bike that feels uniquely yours. Whether you prefer bold racing graphics or a clean, minimal style, the right upgrades can take your dirt bike from stock to stunning.
1992 PRELIMINARY RESULTS:
Thank you to all who participated in the Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Project. If you are still determining what that is, we acted like the PFHOF had its first class in January 1946.
We have completed the first 46 years.
For “1992,” a Preliminary Vote with close to 100 players whose playing career ended by 1991. We also follow the structure in which players have 20 years of eligibility, and if they do not make it into the Hall, they are relegated to the Senior Pool.
Each voter was asked to select 25 names from the preliminary list, and the top 25 vote-getters were named Semi-Finalists.
A week later, the voters will be asked to select 15 names from the 25 Semi-Finalists and then choose five from the remaining 15. We will continue this process every week until we catch up to the current year.
Please note that a significant change occurred “years ago,” allowing voters to submit fewer than the allotted spots.
31 Votes took place.
This is for the “Modern Era”
Bold indicates they advanced to the Semi-Finals:
*Indicates they have been removed from future ballots
|
Player |
Year of Eligibility |
Vote Total |
|
Randy Gradishar LB |
4 |
23 |
|
Elvin Bethea DE |
4 |
22 |
|
John Riggins RB-FB |
2 |
21 |
|
Robert Brazile LB |
3 |
20 |
|
Tom Mack G |
8 |
19 |
|
Dave Casper TE |
3 |
19 |
|
Joe DeLamielleure G |
2 |
19 |
|
Tommy Nobis LB |
11 |
18 |
|
Jackie Smith TE |
9 |
18 |
|
Lynn Swann WR |
5 |
18 |
|
Dave Robinson LB |
13 |
16 |
|
Dave Wilcox LB |
13 |
16 |
|
Bob Griese QB |
7 |
16 |
|
L.C. Greenwood DE |
6 |
16 |
|
Claude Humprhrey DE |
6 |
16 |
|
Jan Stenerud PK |
2 |
16 |
|
Gino Cappelletti FL-SE-DB-WR-PK |
17 |
15 |
|
Dick LeBeau DB |
15 |
15 |
|
Charlie Joiner WR |
1 |
15 |
|
Ray Guy P |
1 |
14 |
|
Roger Brown DT |
18 |
13 |
|
Bob Kuechenberg G-T-C |
4 |
13 |
|
Ken Anderson QB |
1 |
13 |
|
Chris Hanburger LB |
9 |
12 |
|
Ken Stabler QB |
3 |
12 |
|
Cliff Branch WR |
2 |
12 |
|
Ken Riley DB |
4 |
11 |
|
Fred Dean DE |
2 |
11 |
|
Dick Schafrath T-G-DE |
16 |
10 |
|
Lester Hayes DB |
1 |
10 |
|
Louis Wright DB |
1 |
10 |
|
Bobby Boyd DB |
19 |
9 |
|
Jim Marshall DE |
8 |
9 |
|
Otis Taylor WR-FL |
12 |
8 |
|
George Kunz T |
7 |
8 |
|
Curley Culp DT-NT |
6 |
8 |
|
Lemar Parrish DB |
5 |
7 |
|
Harold Jackson WR |
4 |
7 |
|
Drew Pearson WR |
4 |
7 |
|
Rick Upchurch WR/R |
4 |
6 |
|
Mike Stratton LB |
14 |
5 |
|
Floyd Little RB |
12 |
5 |
|
Walt Sweeney G |
12 |
5 |
|
Lyle Alzado DE |
2 |
5 |
|
Joe Theismann QB |
2 |
5 |
|
*Cookie Gilchrist FB |
20 |
4 |
|
*Fuzzy Thurston G |
20 |
4 |
|
Erich Barnes DB |
16 |
4 |
|
Boyd Dowler FL-SE-LB |
16 |
4 |
|
Winston Hill T |
10 |
4 |
|
Cliff Harris S |
8 |
4 |
|
Harold Carmichael WR |
3 |
4 |
|
Doug Wilkerson G |
3 |
4 |
|
Matt Blair LB |
2 |
4 |
|
Ed White G |
2 |
4 |
|
*Abner Haynes HB |
20 |
3 |
|
Art Powell E |
19 |
3 |
|
Dave Grayson DB |
17 |
3 |
|
Houston Antwine DT |
15 |
3 |
|
Rich Jackson DE |
15 |
3 |
|
Andy Russell LB |
11 |
3 |
|
Dick Anderson DB |
10 |
3 |
|
Pat Fischer CB |
10 |
3 |
|
Bill Bergey LB |
7 |
3 |
|
Harvey Martin DE |
4 |
3 |
|
*Max McGee E |
20 |
2 |
|
Bob Talamini G |
19 |
2 |
|
Jack Kemp QB |
18 |
2 |
|
Larry Grantham LB |
15 |
2 |
|
John Brodie QB |
14 |
2 |
|
Jim Nance RB-FB |
14 |
2 |
|
Daryle Lamonica QB |
13 |
2 |
|
John Niland G |
12 |
2 |
|
Larry Brown RB |
11 |
2 |
|
Ed Budde G |
11 |
2 |
|
Ernie McMillan T |
11 |
2 |
|
Ralph Neely T |
10 |
2 |
|
Jerry Smith TE |
10 |
2 |
|
Jim Bakken PK |
9 |
2 |
|
Jack Tatum DB |
7 |
2 |
|
Mike Wagner DB |
7 |
2 |
|
Coy Bacon DE |
6 |
2 |
|
Riley Odoms TE |
4 |
2 |
|
Tom Jackson LB |
1 |
2 |
|
*Goose Gonsoulin DB |
20 |
1 |
|
Clem Daniels HB-DB |
19 |
1 |
|
Jim Katcavage DE-DT |
19 |
1 |
|
Babe Parilli QB |
18 |
1 |
|
Butch Byrd DB |
16 |
1 |
|
George Saimes DB |
15 |
1 |
|
Carroll Dale WR-E |
14 |
1 |
|
Bob Jeter DB-WR |
14 |
1 |
|
Gale Gillingham G-DT |
11 |
1 |
|
Lee Roy Jordan LB |
11 |
1 |
|
Bubba Smith DE |
11 |
1 |
|
Roman Gabriel QB |
10 |
1 |
|
Mike Curtis LB-FB |
9 |
1 |
|
Ron McDole DE-DT |
9 |
1 |
|
Jake Scott DB |
9 |
1 |
|
Lydell Mitchell RB |
7 |
1 |
|
Ken Burrough WR |
6 |
1 |
|
Calvin Hill RB |
6 |
1 |
|
Lawrence McCutchen RB |
6 |
1 |
|
Rich Saul C |
6 |
1 |
|
Mel Gray WR |
5 |
1 |
|
Bert Jones QB |
5 |
1 |
|
Phil Villapiano LB |
4 |
1 |
|
Billy Sims RB |
3 |
1 |
|
Charle Young TE |
2 |
1 |
|
Gary Johnson DT |
2 |
1 |
|
Dwight Hicks DB |
1 |
1 |
|
Mark Moseley |
1 |
1 |
|
Don Meredith QB |
19 |
0 |
|
Howard Mudd G |
17 |
0 |
|
George Andrie DE |
15 |
0 |
|
Cornell Green LB |
13 |
0 |
|
Bill Stanfill DE |
11 |
0 |
|
*Len Hauss C |
10 |
0 |
|
*George Atkinson DB |
8 |
0 |
|
Sam Cunningham QB |
7 |
0 |
|
Chuck Foreman RB |
7 |
0 |
|
*Fred Dryer DE |
6 |
0 |
|
Isiah Robertson LB |
5 |
0 |
|
*Leon Gray T |
4 |
0 |
|
Jim Hart QB |
3 |
0 |
|
*Doug English DT |
2 |
0 |
|
*Gary Green DB |
2 |
0 |
|
*John Jefferson WR |
2 |
0 |
|
William Andrews FB |
1 |
0 |
|
Bob Baumhower NT |
1 |
0 |
|
Henry Lawrence T |
1 |
0 |
|
Nat Moore WR |
1 |
0 |
|
Jeff Van Note C |
1 |
0 |
|
Brad Van Pelt LB |
1 |
0 |
This is for the Senior Era
Bold indicates they advanced to the Semi-Finals:
*Indicates that they will be removed from the ballot permanently.
|
Player |
Year |
Votes |
|
Joe Fortunato LB |
1 |
10 |
|
Pete Retzlaff LB |
1 |
10 |
|
Ward Cuff WB-QB-HB |
20 |
8 |
|
Marshall Goldberg FB |
19 |
7 |
|
Pat Harder FB |
14 |
7 |
|
Alan Ameche FB |
7 |
7 |
|
*Bill Osmanski FB |
20 |
6 |
|
Les Richter LB-C |
5 |
6 |
|
Charles Bidwill OWNER |
3 |
6 |
|
Arch Ward CONTRIBUTOR |
3 |
6 |
|
Woody Strode E |
18 |
5 |
|
Billy Wilson FL-E |
7 |
5 |
|
Greasy Neale COACH |
3 |
5 |
|
*Charley Brock C-HB-FB |
20 |
4 |
|
Charlie Conerly QB |
6 |
4 |
|
George Preston Marshall OWNER |
3 |
4 |
|
Rosey Grier DT-DE |
1 |
4 |
|
Tank Younger FB-LB-HB |
7 |
3 |
|
Harlon Hill E-DB |
5 |
3 |
|
Jim Ray Smith G-T |
3 |
3 |
|
Dan Reeves OWNER |
3 |
3 |
|
*Frank Cope WB-QB-HB |
20 |
2 |
|
Baby Ray T |
19 |
2 |
|
Bruno Banducci G |
13 |
2 |
|
Bill Forester LB-MG-DT |
4 |
2 |
|
Earl Faison DE |
1 |
2 |
|
Paul Christman QB |
17 |
1 |
|
Frankie Albert QB |
15 |
1 |
|
Ray Bray G |
15 |
1 |
|
Leon Hart E-FB-DE |
10 |
1 |
|
Les Bingaman DG-G-C |
13 |
1 |
|
Spec Sanders TB |
17 |
0 |
|
*Buster Ramsey G |
16 |
0 |
|
Bill Fischer T-G-DT |
13 |
0 |
|
Bob Gain DT-DE-MG-T |
3 |
0 |
This is for the “Coaches/Contributors”
Bold indicates they advanced to the Semi-Finals:
*Indicates that they will be removed from the ballot permanently.
|
Name |
Year |
Votes |
|
COACH: Tom Landry |
2 |
27 |
|
OWNER: Ralph Wilson |
1 |
15 |
|
SCOUT: Gil Brandt |
1 |
13 |
|
OWNER: Tex Schramm |
13 |
12 |
|
OWNER: Wellington Mara |
6 |
12 |
|
TV EXEC: Roone Arledge |
6 |
7 |
|
EXEC: Jim Finks |
3 |
7 |
|
OWNER: Clint Murchison |
11 |
5 |
|
TV COMMENTATOR: Howard Cosell |
6 |
5 |
|
COACH: Bum Phillips |
5 |
5 |
|
EXEC: George Halas Jr. |
13 |
3 |
|
COACH: Bill Arnsbarger |
6 |
3 |
|
OWNER: Bud Adams |
11 |
2 |
|
OWNER: Art Modell |
7 |
2 |
|
EXEC: Russ Thomas |
4 |
1 |
|
OWNER: Hugh Culverhouse |
2 |
1 |
|
*COACH: Steve Ortmayer |
4 |
0 |
|
COACH: Lindy Infante |
3 |
0 |
|
*OWNER/EXEC: Bill Bidwill |
2 |
0 |
|
*OWNER: Rankin Smith |
2 |
0 |
|
COACH: Ralph Hawkins |
1 |
0 |
|
EXEC: Ladd Hersog |
1 |
0 |
|
COACH: Ed Hughes |
1 |
0 |
|
COACH: Dick Modzelweski |
1 |
0 |
|
EXEC: Mike Robbie |
1 |
0 |
Next week, we will announce the Semi-Finalists for the 1992 Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Project.