gold star for USAHOF
Committee Chairman

Committee Chairman

Kirk Buchner, "The Committee Chairman", is the owner and operator of the site.  Kirk can be contacted at [email protected] .

In today’s fast-paced media landscape, news channels always look for the next hot trend, and edibles have quickly become a favorite subject. Whether gourmet gummies or creatively infused snacks, these products appear in headlines, lifestyle segments, and social media teasers. But behind the buzz is a strategic approach to how news outlets spotlight these trendy treats. From visual storytelling to influencer tie-ins, news channels use seven key strategies to keep edibles in the spotlight and shape the conversation around what’s trending.

Here Are The Strategies News Channels Use To Promote Trending Edibles

Lifestyle segment features

Lifestyle segment features are a strategy that news channels use to promote trending edibles. These segments often highlight edibles as part of broader coverage on food trends, entertaining tips, or new product launches. 

By placing edibles in a casual, everyday context—like party planning or gift guides—news channels make the topic approachable and relevant to a wide audience. This soft-sell approach helps normalize the conversation around edibles while keeping viewers engaged with fresh, timely content.

Celebrity tie-ins

A strategy that news channels use to promote trending edibles is celebrity tie-ins. When a well-known personality launches or endorses an edible brand, news outlets often pick up the story as entertainment or pop culture content. 

These features grab attention quickly, as audiences are naturally curious about celebrity choices and lifestyle trends. By connecting edibles with recognizable names, news channels add a layer of influence and buzz that helps drive interest and conversation.

Bold product visuals

Bold product visuals are a strategy that news channels use to promote trending edibles. Eye-catching imagery—such as colorful packaging, creative presentations, and close-up shots—grabs viewers’ attention instantly. 

These visuals are often used in b-roll footage, on-screen graphics, and social media previews to make the segment more visually appealing. News outlets create a strong first impression that encourages curiosity and interest in the product by focusing on the aesthetic appeal.

Social media teasers

A strategy that news channels use to promote trending edibles is social media teasers. Short clips, behind-the-scenes shots, and catchy headlines are shared across platforms to build anticipation before the full segment airs. 

These teasers often feature quick product glimpses, a notable quote, or a fun visual to spark engagement. By leveraging social media, news outlets extend their reach and create a buzz that drives viewers to tune in or share the content.

Seasonal trend roundups

A strategy that news channels use to promote trending edibles is seasonal trend roundups. These segments highlight popular products tied to holidays, weather changes, or cultural events, positioning edibles as timely and relevant. 

Whether it’s a Valentine's-themed treat or a summer snack trend, including edibles in these roundups helps them stand out as part of a larger seasonal narrative. This approach keeps content fresh and encourages viewers to explore what’s new or limited-time in the edible space.

Maker/event coverage

A strategy that news channels use to promote trending edibles is maker/event coverage. They spotlight the creativity and craftsmanship behind popular products by attending expos, pop-up shops, or behind-the-scenes tours. 

These segments often include interviews with brand founders, visuals of the production process, and highlights from live events. For example, a feature on a local artisan fair might naturally showcase THC Gummies among other trending items, giving viewers a glimpse into what’s catching attention in the edible market.

Expert panel mentions

Expert panel mentions are a strategy that news channels use to promote trending edibles. During discussions on food trends, consumer behavior, or product innovation, panelists often bring up edibles as part of the evolving market landscape. 

These mentions carry weight, especially from chefs, brand consultants, or trend forecasters. By including edibles in expert conversations, news channels lend credibility to their popularity and subtly guide viewer interest toward what’s considered current and noteworthy.

Why Do News Channels Promote Trending Edibles?

To attract viewer interest with popular topics

News channels promote trending edibles to attract viewer interest with popular topics. By featuring products generating buzz, they tap into what people are already curious about and discussing.

This approach helps capture attention quickly, drawing in viewers who want to stay up-to-date on the latest trends. Highlighting trending edibles keeps the content fresh and relevant, encouraging audiences to tune in regularly for the newest and most talked-about stories.

To tap into current lifestyle and culture trends

News channels promote trending edibles to tap into current lifestyle and culture trends. Edibles often reflect broader shifts in how people approach food, entertainment, and social experiences, making them a natural fit for lifestyle coverage. 

By featuring these products, news outlets connect with viewers interested in what’s shaping modern culture and everyday living. This alignment helps the content feel timely and relevant, positioning the channel as a go-to source for the latest lifestyle trends.

To generate social media engagement and shares

News channels promote trending edibles to generate social media engagement and shares. Eye-catching visuals and intriguing stories about these products make for highly shareable content across platforms. 

Viewers interacting with posts or clips featuring popular edibles helps spread the coverage further and drives more traffic back to the channel. This boost in online activity raises awareness and encourages conversations that keep the trend alive in digital spaces.

To showcase innovative products and brands

News channels promote trending edibles to showcase innovative products and brands. Featuring these items allows outlets to highlight creativity and new ideas within the food and lifestyle space. 

By spotlighting unique flavors, packaging, or concepts, news channels bring attention to brands pushing boundaries and capturing consumer interest. This focus on innovation keeps content fresh and exciting, appealing to viewers eager to discover what’s new and different.

To provide fresh, visually appealing content

News channels promote trending edibles to provide fresh, visually appealing content. These products' vibrant colors, interesting textures, and creative presentations make for compelling visuals that capture viewers’ attention. 

Including such eye-catching elements helps break up standard programming and adds variety to broadcasts. By showcasing edibles visually engagingly, news outlets keep their content lively and inviting, encouraging audiences to stay tuned and explore the latest trends.

204. Corey Dillon

Corey Dillon was an All-Rookie (1997) after the Cincinnati Bengals took him in the Second Round from the University of Washington.

The Running Back was a workhorse from the start, going for 1,129 Yards and 10 Touchdowns.  Dillon's 1,129 was the lowest Rushing total he had until 2003, and in his rookie seasons and each year from 1999 to 2002, he was in the top ten in Rushing Yards.  Dillon peaked at 1,435 Rushing Yards in 2000, and he had three consecutive years (2000-02), where he had at least 1,500 Yards From Scrimmage.  He was also a three-time Pro Bowler for the Bengals from 1999 to 2001.

After a poor 2003 season, Dillon was traded to New England and had one of his best years in football, setting a team record 1,635 Rushing Yards and winning a Super Bowl Ring (XXXIX) with the Patriots, which was the same season he earned his fourth and Final Pro Bowl Selection.

Over his career, Dillon compiled 13,154 YFS with 89 Touchdowns.

1978 PRELIMINARY RESULTS:

Thank you to all who participated in the Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Project. If you are still determining what that is, we acted like the PFHOF had its first class in January 1947.

We have completed the first 30 years thus far.

For “1978,” a Preliminary Vote with close to 100 players whose playing career ended by 1972. We are also following the structure in that players have 20 years of eligibility, and if they do not make it into the Hall, they are relegated to the Senior Pool.

Each voter was asked to select 25 names from the preliminary list, and the top 25 vote-getters were named Semi-Finalists.

A week later, the voters will be asked to pick 15 names from the 25 Semi-Finalists, and next after, they will pick five from the remaining 15. We will continue this process weekly until we catch up to the current year.

Please note that a significant change occurred “years ago,” allowing voters to submit less than the allotted spots. 

31 Votes took place.

This is for the “Modern Era”

Bold indicates they advanced to the Semi-Finals:

*Indicates they have been removed from future ballots

 

Player

Year of Eligibility

Vote Total

Lance Alworth FL-WR

1

24

Mike Ditka TE

1

24

Ray Nitschke LB

1

23

Del Shofner E-DB

6

22

Larry Wilson S

1

22

Billy Shaw G

4

21

Billy Howton E-FL

10

20

Jimmy Patton DB

7

19

Pete Retzlaff E-HB-TE

7

19

Eddie Meador DB

3

19

John Mackey TE

1

19

Tom Sestak DT

5

18

Herb Adderly DB

1

18

Joe Fortunato LB

7

17

Gino Cappelletti FL-SE-DB-WR-PK

3

17

Johnny Robinson DB-FL-HB

2

17

Pat Harder E

20

16

Dick LeBeau DB

1

16

Gene Lipscomb DT

11

14

Les Richter LB-C

11

13

Art Powell E

5

13

Alan Ameche FB

13

12

Billy Wilson E-FL

13

12

Bucko Kilroy G-MG-T-DT

18

11

Tank Younger FB-LB-HB

15

10

Abe Woodson DB

7

10

Charlie Conerly QB

12

9

Bobby Boyd DB

5

9

Dick Schafrath T-G-DE

2

9

Larry Grantham LB

1

9

Max McGee E

6

8

Jack Kemp QB

4

8

Dave Grayson DB

2

8

Rosey Grier DT-DE

7

7

Cookie Gilchrist FB

6

7

Roger Brown DT

4

7

Vic Sears T-DT

20

6

Bruno Banducci G

19

6

Abner Haynes HB

6

6

Ernie Ladd DT

5

6

Houston Antwine DT

1

6

Rich Jackson DE

1

6

George Saimes DB

1

6

Les Bingaman DG-G-C

19

5

Harlon Hill E-DB

11

5

Fuzzy Thurston G

6

5

Clem Daniels HB-DB

5

5

Boyd Dowler FL-SE-LB

2

5

Erich Barnes DB

2

5

Richie Petitbon DB

1

5

Bob Gain DT-DE-MG-T

9

4

Rick Cesares FB

7

4

Earl Faison DE

7

4

Jim Katcavage DE-DT

5

4

Don Meredith QB

5

4

E.J. Holub LB-C

2

4

Matt Snell RB

1

4

Duane Putnam G

11

3

Tobin Rote QB

7

3

Goose Gonsoulin DB

6

3

John David Crow HB-TE-FB

5

3

Howard Mudd G

2

3

Pat Studstill FL-P

1

3

Rosey Taylor DB

1

3

George Ratterman QB

17

2

Leon Hart E-FB-DE

16

2

Bobby Walston E-HB-K

11

2

Bill Forester LB-MG-DT

10

2

Walt Michaels LB

10

2

Jim Ray Smith G-T

9

2

Charley Hennigan FL

7

2

Keith Lincoln FB-HB

5

2

Fred Arbanas TE

2

2

Gary Collins FL-WR-P

2

2

George Andrie DE

1

2

Lee Roy Caffey LB

1

2

Bob Vogel T

1

2

Marion Campbell DE-DT-MG-G-T

12

1

Alex Webster HB-FB

9

1

Archie Matsos LB

7

1

Dick Modzelewski DT

7

1

Fred Williamson DB

6

1

Bob Talamini G

5

1

Stew Barber T-LB-G

4

1

Paul Lowe HB

4

1

Babe Parilli QB

4

1

Jerry Mays DE-DT

3

1

Billy Cannon TE-HB

3

1

Frank Ryan QB

2

1

George Sauer SE-WR

2

1

Tommy Mason HB

2

1

Jim Houston LB-DE

1

1

Jack Pardee LB

1

1

Wayne Walker LB

1

1

*Abe Gibron G

14

0

*Bobby Joe Conrad FL-DB-HB-WR-PK

4

0

Gail Codgill SE-WR

3

0

Ken Gray G-DE

3

0

*Al Denson WR-FL

2

0

*Lou Michaels DE-K

2

0

*Jerry Stovall DB-P

2

0

*Walt Suggs T-C

2

0

Jim Dunaway DT

1

0

Jerry Logan DB

1

0

Fred Miller DT

1

0

Ernie Wright T

1

0

 

This is for the “Senior Era”

Bold indicates they advanced to the Semi-Finals:

*Indicates that they will be removed from the ballot permanently.

 

Player

Year

Votes

Buckets Goldenberg

8

15

Whizzer White

12

14

Marshall Goldberg

5

13

Woody Strode

4

12

Ward Cuff

6

10

Frankie Albert

1

10

Ace Gutkowski

14

8

Jack Manders

13

8

George Svendesen 

12

6

George Wilson

7

6

Bill Osmanski

6

5

Charley Brock

6

4

Spec Sanders

3

4

Frank Cope

6

3

Buster Ramsey

2

3

Baby Ray

5

2

Paul Christman

3

2

Ray Bray

1

2

*Tommy Thompson

3

0

 

Please note that one voted for “None of the Above.”

 

This is for the “Coaches/Contributors”

Bold indicates they advanced to the Semi-Finals:

*Indicates that they will be removed from the ballot permanently.

 

Name

Year

Votes

COACH: Buddy Parker

9

27

COACH: Weeb Ewbank

2

23

OWNER: Charles Bidwill

9

16

COACH: Greasy Neale

9

13

OWNER: Dan Reeves

9

12

OWNER:  George Preston Marshall

9

10

COACH: Blanton Collier

6

7

EXEC:  Arch Ward

9

6

COMM: Elmer Layden

9

5

OWNER: Edwin J. Anderson

9

3

EXEC: Dominic Olejniczak

4

3

COACH:  Jim Lee Howell

9

2

GM/EXEC: Arch Wolfe

9

2

GM/CONT: Dick McCann

9

1

COACH:  Allie Sharman

7

1

COACH: Nick Skorich

2

1

EXEC: Vince McNally

1

1

 

Next week, we will announce the Semi-Finalists for the 1978 Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Project.

178. Lorenzo Neal

The modern Fullback appears to be a relic of football’s past, but when used correctly, it is a thing of beauty to watch.  Lorenzo Neal might be the game’s last great Fullback.

A traditional back at Fresno State, Neal was converted to a Fullback by the team that drafted him, New Orleans, to the position. In 1997, he set a record by blocking for 11 consecutive 1,000-yard rushers in history.  Playing for multiple teams, his best and most recognized run was in San Diego, where he paved the way for Hall of Fame Running Back LaDainian Tomlinson, and he was rewarded with multiple Pro Bowls and an All-Decade Selection. 

The odds of him getting enshrined into Canton are not strong, but his accomplishments set him apart from most of the Fullbacks from his time on.