Menu
A+ A A-
Committee Chairman

Committee Chairman

Kirk Buchner, "The Committee Chairman", is the owner and operator of the site.  Kirk can be contacted at [email protected] .

The Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Project: 1992 Semi-Final VOTE

1992 SEMI-FINAL RESULTS:

Thank you for your participation in the Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Project. If you are unaware of what that is, we acted like the PFHOF had its first class in January 1946.

We have completed the years up to 1991.

For “1992,” a Preliminary Vote with nearly 100 players whose playing career ended by 1986. We also follow the structure in which players have 20 years of eligibility, and if they do not make it into the Hall, they are relegated to the Senior Pool.

Each voter was asked to select 25 names from the preliminary list, and the top 25 vote-getters were named Semi-Finalists.

A week later, the voters were asked to pick 15 names from the 25 Semi-Finalists, and next week, they will choose five from the remaining 15. We will continue this process every week until we catch up to the current year.

32 votes were cast, with the top 15 advancing.

This is for the “Modern Era”

Bold indicates they advanced to the Finals: 

Player

Year of Eligibility

Vote Total

Tom Mack G

9

26

Dave Casper TE

3

25

Jackie Smith TE

9

23

Lynn Swann WR

5

23

Randy Gradishar LB

4

23

Dave Wilcox LB

13

21

Elvin Bethea DE

4

21

Joe DeLamielleure G

2

21

Bob Griese QB

7

20

Robert Brazile LB

3

20

Charlie Joiner WR

1

18

John Riggins RB-FB

2

19

Jan Stenerud PK

2

16

L.C. Greenwood DE

6

15

Ray Guy P

1

15

Dick LeBeau DB

15

14

Ken Stabler QB

3

14

Gino Cappelletti FL-SE-DB-WR-K

17

13

Tommy Nobis LB

11

13

Claude Humphrey DE

6

13

Ken Anderson QB

1

12

Dave Robinson LB

13

11

Chris Hanburger LB

9

11

Bob Kuechenberg G-T-C

4

11

Cliff Branch WR

2

11

Roger Brown DT

18

9

This is for the “Senior Era”

*Bold indicates they advanced to the Finals:

Player

Year of Eligibility

Vote Total

Joe Fortunato LB

1

20

Pete Retzlaff E-HB-TE

1

19

Pat Harder FB 

14

12

Marshall Goldberg FB

19

11

Ward Cuff WB-QB-HB

20

8

Alan Ameche FB

7

12

Billy Wilson E

7

6

None of the Above

1

This is for the “Coaches/Contributors Era”

*Bold indicates they advanced to the Finals:

Player

Year of Eligibility

Vote Total

COACH: Tom Landry

2

31

OWNER: Wellington Mara

6

17

SCOUT: Gil Brandt

1

13

OWNER: Ralph Wilson

1

11

OWNER: Tex Schramm

12

10

We will post the Class of 1992 Pro Football Hall of Fame Revisited Project next Saturday.

Thank you to all who contributed. If you want to be part of this project, please let us know!

Best Cryptocurrency for Online Casinos: BTC vs ETH vs USDT

Introduction

Crypto casinos are reshaping how people play online. Picking the right cryptocurrency can make a huge difference in your experience. The coin you choose affects transaction speed, fees, and whether your bankroll stays stable or fluctuates wildly while you're mid-game.

Dozens of cryptocurrencies exist, but three dominate the online casino space: Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Tether (USDT). Each has unique strengths and trade-offs. This guide compares them head-to-head across the factors that matter most: cost, speed, volatility, platform support, and ease of use. By the end, you'll know exactly which crypto fits your playing style.

Let's break it down.

Bitcoin (BTC) - The Industry Standard

Bitcoin is the most widely accepted cryptocurrency at online casinos. Walk into any crypto casino site, and you'll find BTC support front and center. Casinos like JB.com, BiggerZ.com and nearly every other operator accept Bitcoin deposits and withdrawals, making it the default choice for millions of players worldwide.

Why does Bitcoin hold this position? Simple. It was first, it's trusted, and it's everywhere.

Pros

  • Universal acceptance - Supported by nearly 100% of crypto casinos. If a platform takes crypto, it takes Bitcoin.
  • High liquidity - Easy to buy, sell, and convert on any exchange. You can move in and out of BTC quickly.
  • Security - The most established and battle-tested blockchain network. Bitcoin's network has operated without a major breach since 2009.
  • Largest bonuses - Many casinos tie their biggest welcome offers to BTC deposits. Bonuses up to 5 BTC are common at top-tier sites.
  • Lightning Network option - Some casinos now support Lightning for near-instant, low-fee BTC transactions. This solves Bitcoin's speed and cost issues for players who want the best of both worlds.

Cons

  • Slower confirmations - Standard on-chain transactions average around 10 minutes per block. Casinos may require 1 to 3 confirmations before crediting your account.
  • Higher fees - Average on-chain fees sit around $1 to $5 per transaction. During network congestion, fees can spike past $30, making small deposits expensive.
  • Price volatility - A deposit of 0.01 BTC could lose 5% to 10% in value before you even place a bet. Price swings can eat into your bankroll or boost it unexpectedly.

Best For

Players who prioritize platform compatibility, want access to the largest bonuses, and are comfortable with price fluctuations.

Ethereum (ETH) - Speed and Smart Contract Power

Ethereum brings more to the table than just payment processing. Its smart contract functionality powers decentralized casinos, provably fair games, and NFT-based reward systems. ETH is the second most accepted crypto at online casinos, and its technical capabilities open doors that Bitcoin can't.

If you're interested in playing on decentralized platforms or want faster transaction times than Bitcoin, Ethereum deserves your attention.

Pros

  • Faster than BTC - Block times average around 12 seconds, compared to Bitcoin's 10 minutes. Your deposits appear in your casino account much quicker.
  • Smart contract support - Enables provably fair games, automated payouts, and decentralized casino platforms (dApps). You can verify game fairness directly on the blockchain.
  • Growing Layer 2 ecosystem - Networks like Arbitrum and Base are reducing fees and increasing transaction speed. These solutions make Ethereum more affordable and scalable for everyday use.
  • Wide acceptance - Supported by most major crypto casinos alongside BTC. You won't struggle to find a platform that takes ETH.

Cons

  • Variable gas fees - Fees on the Ethereum mainnet can spike unpredictably during network congestion. Historically, gas fees have hit $28 or higher during peak periods. Mid-2025 averages sat under $0.50, but spikes still happen.
  • Still volatile - ETH price swings can impact your bankroll value between deposit and withdrawal. Like Bitcoin, Ethereum's price moves fast.
  • ERC-20 confusion - Players must ensure they select the correct network (ERC-20 vs. other chains) when depositing. Sending ETH on the wrong network can result in permanently lost funds.

Best For

Players who value faster transactions, want access to decentralized casino platforms, or plan to use Ethereum-based dApps and provably fair games.

Tether (USDT) - The Stable Bankroll Option

Tether (USDT) is a stablecoin pegged 1:1 to the US dollar. Your $100 deposit stays worth $100 when you're ready to withdraw, no matter what happens in the crypto market. This stability makes USDT the go-to choice for players who want predictability.

If you've ever deposited Bitcoin, watched the price drop 8% during your session, and then cashed out less than you started with (despite winning), you understand the appeal of stablecoins.

Pros

  • Price stability - Pegged to USD. Eliminates the volatility risk that affects BTC and ETH. A dollar is a dollar, today and tomorrow.
  • Predictable bankroll - Players can manage funds in familiar dollar terms without doing conversion math every time they check their balance.
  • Multiple network options - Available on TRC-20 (Tron), ERC-20 (Ethereum), and other chains. TRC-20 offers near-zero fees and near-instant confirmations, making it the cheapest and fastest USDT option.
  • Growing casino adoption - Increasingly supported at crypto casinos, with some offering USDT-specific bonuses. Welcome packages up to 20,000 USDT are available at select platforms.

Cons

  • Centralized issuer - Tether Ltd. controls the supply, which raises trust and regulatory questions for some users. Critics point to concerns about transparency and reserves backing the stablecoin.
  • No investment upside - Unlike BTC or ETH, USDT won't increase in value. Players looking for potential price appreciation should look elsewhere.
  • Network selection matters - Depositing USDT on the wrong network (sending ERC-20 USDT to a TRC-20 address) can result in permanently lost funds. Always double-check the network before every transaction.

Best For

Players who want a stable, dollar-equivalent bankroll with low fees (especially on TRC-20) and prefer to keep gambling and investing as separate activities.

BTC vs ETH vs USDT - Side-by-Side Comparison

Here's the breakdown in table form:

Factor

BTC

ETH

USDT

Casino Acceptance

Highest (near-universal)

Very high

High and growing

Transaction Speed

~10 min (on-chain)

~12 sec (L1)

Near-instant (TRC-20)

Average Fees

$1–$5

Variable ($0.50–$5+)

Near-zero (TRC-20)

Price Volatility

High

High

None (pegged to USD)

Bonus Availability

Largest offers

Moderate

Growing USDT bonuses

Smart Contracts

Limited

Yes (dApps, provably fair)

No

Best For

Maximum compatibility

dApps & speed

Bankroll stability

The "best" coin depends entirely on what matters most to you. No single answer fits every player.

How to Choose the Right Crypto for Your Casino Experience

Making the right choice comes down to your priorities. Here's a quick decision guide:

  • If you want maximum platform compatibility and the biggest bonuses → choose BTC. You'll have access to every crypto casino and the most generous welcome offers.
  • If you want faster transactions and access to decentralized casino games → choose ETH. The speed and smart contract features open up new types of gaming experiences.
  • If you want bankroll stability and the lowest fees → choose USDT (TRC-20). Your balance stays stable, and transaction costs are nearly zero.

Pro tip: Many experienced players use a combination. USDT for day-to-day play (stable value, low fees) and BTC or ETH for platforms that offer better bonuses on those coins. You can switch between them based on the situation.

Whichever coin you pick, verify the casino supports it, check network and fee details, and never send funds on the wrong network. One wrong click can mean lost money with no way to recover it.

FAQ Section

Q: Can I use more than one cryptocurrency at the same casino?
A: Yes, most crypto casinos support multiple coins. You can deposit in one and withdraw in another if the platform allows it.

Q: Which crypto has the lowest fees for casino deposits?
A: USDT on the TRC-20 (Tron) network typically has near-zero transaction fees, making it the cheapest option.

Q: Will my Bitcoin deposit lose value while I play?
A: It can. BTC is volatile, so your deposit may increase or decrease in value during your session. Use USDT if you want to avoid this risk.

Q: Is it safe to gamble with cryptocurrency?
A: Crypto transactions are secure, but always choose licensed, audited casinos and enable two-factor authentication. Research the platform before depositing.

Our All Time Top 50 Chicago White Sox have been revised to reflect the 2025 Season

Yes, we know that this is taking a while!

As many of you know, we at Notinhalloffame.com are slowly generating the top 50 of each major North American sports team. That being said, we maintain and update our existing Top 50 lists annually.  As such, we are delighted to present our pre-2026 revision of our top 50 Chicago Cubs.

As for all of our top 50 players in baseball, we look at the following: 

1.  Duration and Impact.

2.  Traditional statistics and how they finished in the Major League Baseball.

3.  Advanced Statistics.

4.  Playoff performance.

5. Their respective legacy on the team.

6. How successful the team was when he was there.

7. Respecting the era in which they played.

Criteria 1-4 will make up the lion’s share of the algorithm.  Please note that we have implemented this for the first time.  This has changed the rankings all throughout the board.

Last year, the White Sox were awful, winning only 60 Games.  None of the active players made a debut on the Top 50, nor were there any active players on the list.

As always, we present our top five, which saw a slight change.

1. Frank Thomas
2. Ed Walsh
3. Luke Appling
4. Ted Lyons
5. Red Faber

You can find the entire list here.

The new algorithm has led us to revise the list, with the most notable change in the top five, where Ed Walsh and Luke Appling flipped spots.

We thank you for your continued support of our lists on Notinhalloffame.com.

The Notinhalloffame Baseball list has been revised: 31-40

Last January, the Baseball Hall of Fame announced the Class of 2026, and for us at Notinhalloffame.com, this means it is time to revise the list of those to consider for the Hall.

At present, it is a work in progress, as we have multiple projects underway (including prepping the ballot for the 2026 United States Athletic Hall of Fame), but we are also slowly working on the Baseball Hall revision.

Our revisions take into account the following:

  • Removing those who were inducted and including those who are now eligible.
  • Taking in your votes and comments and adjusting accordingly.

Simple, right?

As this is a work in progress, the section is under construction, but we will keep you apprised of the changes as we go.

The entire list (again, it is under construction) is here,  but in the meantime, here is the revised 31-40:

31. Buster Posey (Debut)
32. Stan Hack
33. David Cone
34. Graig Nettles
35. Bill Freehan
36. Dave Stieb
37. Kevin Brown
38. Bob Caruthers
39. Andy Pettitte
40. Allie Reynolds

Look for more updates soon.

I own and run three sites, one of which is the United States Athletic Hall of Fame.   The USAHOF is a grassroots organization designed to honor the greatest American Athletes of all time.

Thus far, we have completed three years of inductions.  The way it works is that we have a committee of sportswriters and athletes who help us decide which athletes should be on the ballot.   A ballot is provided to the committee with 125 athletes, and the top 25 advance to the public ballot.   This is online for six months, and the top 25 athletes (along with five coaches, contributors, and broadcasters).

I am seeking to expand the athletes who help us with the voting process.

It would only take roughly ten minutes of your time, and is all done digitally.  We would then ask your permission to use your name as one of the committee members.

Our site is www.theusahof.com, and please let me know if you are interested or have any questions.

Looking forward to hearing back from you!

Kirk