Menu
A+ A A-
Site Admin

Site Admin

32. Stan Hack

Stan Hack played his entire 16-season career with the Chicago Cubs.  He was one of the Cubbies most popular players as “Smilin” Stan’s sunny disposition made him a fan favorite among players, fans, and journalists alike.  It also didn’t hurt that he was one hell of a hitter.

Hack hit over 2,100 hits batting first for Chicago, but like any true good leadoff hitter, he found a way to get on base.  Hack knew how to draw the free pass and was constantly among league leaders in On Base Percentage.  Once on the base paths, Hack was an intelligent base runner, making few mistakes.  He made even fewer mistakes at third, where he would have likely won multiple Gold Gloves had they been implemented at the time.

Hack had no significant slugging numbers, but that was not what he was paid to do.  His main goals were to get on base and defend the hot corner, and he did both very well.  He did accumulate some of his numbers during a weakened league (during World War II), but he was a consistent performer who should have gotten more Hall of Fame votes than he did.


Should Stan Hack be in the Hall of Fame?

Definitely put him in! - 77.2%
Maybe, but others deserve it first. - 8.3%
Probably not, but it wouldn't be the end of the world. - 10.3%
No opinion. - 0.7%
No way! - 3.4%

51. Rusty Staub

If the main criteria for the Hall are perseverance and effort, then Rusty Staub should have been a first-ballot Hall of Famer.  His hard work resulted in over 2,700 hits in a Major League career that many people who saw him early on would never have pegged him for.

Nobody could ever accuse Staub of not giving everything he had, regardless of the endeavor.  Those efforts included cooking, history, and, of course, baseball.  They called him eccentric for these things, but his meticulous nature turned him into a pure hitter and gained him respect throughout the league.  He made six All-Star Games but did so without showing much power (though he hit 25 homers twice) and without any real speed.  What he did do was hit for average consistently and walk frequently, which enabled him, even late in his career, to be a solid pinch-hitter.

Staub may have been freakishly consistent, but he was never dominant and was never a serious contender for any postseason award.  Six All-Star appearances were impressive, but rarely has the Baseball Hall of Fame rewarded longevity without at least a flash of immortality.  If they did, Staub would be a good place to start.

Should Rusty Staub be in the Hall of Fame?

Definitely put him in! - 77.6%
Maybe, but others deserve it first. - 9.9%
Probably not, but it wouldn't be the end of the world. - 9.9%
No opinion. - 0%
No way! - 2.6%

28. Bobby Grich

1,800 career hits and a lifetime .266 Batting Average sounds like a good career, but not necessarily a Hall of Fame one.  A closer look at Bobby Grich's overall body of work indicates he is much closer than you might think.

Prior to Grich, the prototypical second baseman was a smaller athlete who was a wizard with the glove, and any offense you got from him was a bonus.  There were occasional exceptions, but that was generally the rule for the position.  Grich was oversized for a Second Baseman, but had exceptional range and won four Gold Gloves.  Grich had decent power and co-led the league in homers during the strike-shortened season of 1981.  Grich may not have been dazzling with his traditional batting numbers, but he was with his On Base Percentage, which was often well over a hundred points over his Batting average.

Bobby Grich had the misfortune of making the ALCS five times, but his teams could not get to the World Series.  Grich may not have been any serious threat for a postseason award, but time is showing a new light on his contributions and his ushering in of a new wave of offensively capable second basemen.  We are still not sure if he should be in the Hall, but we do believe he deserved better than being a “one and done” for the Baseball Writers in terms of his eligibility.

Should Bobby Grich be in the Hall of Fame?

Definitely put him in! - 60.3%
Maybe, but others deserve it first. - 17.6%
Probably not, but it wouldn't be the end of the world. - 8.4%
No opinion. - 0.8%
No way! - 13%

45. Dave Concepcion

One of two things could happen when you play with a collection of superstars.  Either you get lost in the shuffle, or you become incorrectly elevated among them.  Neither was the case for Dave Concepcion, who became nationally known playing alongside Pete Rose, Joe Morgan, Johnny Bench, and Tony Perez, but deserved the attention that came with it.

Dave Concepcion played with some of the all-time greats with the Big Red Machine, but he, too, was a huge contributor to the success of that organization.  He was the anchor of the defense, and in an era where shortstops were expected to be “good field, no hit”, Dave Concepcion contributed to the Reds’ offense as well.  He was not dominating the league with his offensive numbers, but he hit when it counted, and his best efforts were showcased when his team needed him most, as shown by his .300+ Batting Average in all three World Series.

There is little doubt that Dave Concepcion was easily among the top three shortstops of his era.  The issue is that his era did not produce many players in that position who could even remotely be considered for the Hall.  Concepcion would struggle today to put offensive numbers that would put him in the top ten at shortstop.  This isn’t Dave’s fault, but this may be a huge reason that he didn’t make the Hall during his fifteen years of initial eligibility.  With that said, an informal poll of his peers would have likely deemed Dave Concepcion a Hall of Fame inductee.  Let’s see if the Veterans Committee will one day agree.

Should Dave Concepcion be in the Hall of Fame?

Definitely put him in! - 88.1%
Maybe, but others deserve it first. - 3.3%
Probably not, but it wouldn't be the end of the world. - 2.5%
No opinion. - 0.4%
No way! - 5.3%