Menu
A+ A A-
Site Admin

Site Admin

15. Wes Ferrell

Athletes are competitive by nature, but 99.9 percent of them paled to the competitive juices of Wes Ferrell.  He was known to get violent whenever he lost and take it out on himself and inanimate objects.  He may have been animated himself at times, but his teammates have always said they wanted him on their side.

Wes Ferrell’s first four years as a regular in the Indians’ rotation saw him win twenty games.  He would do so again on two more occasions, utilizing a brilliant fastball and an assortment of pitches.  He was one of the only pitchers to retire with a winning percentage over .600, and he did so as an innings-eating starter.  Ferrell also may be one of the game’s greatest hitting pitchers as he has decent power numbers and a lifetime .280 average.

His numbers began to decline sharply as his arm gave out, and he was not able to make the career numbers that would have ensured him a Cooperstown plaque.  If he had similar metrics in the last thirty years, he would likely not have to fight for that spot in Cooperstown



Should Wes Ferrell be in the Hall of Fame?

Definitely put him in! - 65.4%
Maybe, but others deserve it first. - 14.1%
Probably not, but it wouldn't be the end of the world. - 12.8%
No opinion. - 0%
No way! - 7.7%

6. Lou Whitaker

Playing with Alan Trammell for virtually his entire career, Lou Whitaker was one half of the longest-running double play combination in Baseball history.  Like Trammell, Whitaker was a great player with both bat and glove and a big part of Detroit’s World Series win in 1984.

Whitaker was one of the top Second Basemen of his era, yet he did not receive the same respect or notoriety as others.  He won the American League Rookie of the Year in 1978, and though he did not live up to the lofty expectations placed upon him, records show that he was a very consistent performer. Though he was not among the league leaders in offensive categories, he was a competent producer and easily among the top in his position.

The criticism of Lou Whitaker stems from the fact that it looked so easy for him.  Everything he did had such a beautiful flow; he often looked like he wasn’t giving it all on the field.  He was also quiet, unlike the boisterous athlete people would expect.  As such, he did not draw much attention to himself and preferred it that way.  When Whitaker didn't make it past the first year of Hall of Fame voting (which he should have), he didn’t complain.  He simply said that if he didn’t make it the first time, don’t bring his name back up”.  This type of humility just makes you like “Sweet Lou” even more.



Should Lou Whitaker be in the Hall of Fame?

Definitely put him in! - 87.9%
Maybe, but others deserve it first. - 6.3%
Probably not, but it wouldn't be the end of the world. - 4.4%
No opinion. - 0%
No way! - 1.5%

74. Vada Pinson

The start of Vada Pinson’s career showed promise of a Hall of Fame career as he was a five-tool baseball player.  So just how does a player who had this much promise still compile over 2,700 hits and yet have what was considered a journeyman career?

The easy answer may be that Vada Pinson had many very good seasons, but none that could be considered great.  He racked up many hits (four times he compiled over 200 in a season), but wasn’t always considered a clutch hitter, as shown when he batted .091 in his lone World Series in 1961.   He had decent speed but never led the league in steals.  He could field, but only had one Gold Glove.  He had a great Batting Average but barely walked giving him a relatively low On Base Percentage.

Pinson was durable, lasted a long time, and took a lot of hits in his career.  He was very good for a long time (far longer than most), but without that one season of being great, the case for Vada Pinson’s Hall of Fame candidacy becomes a tough sell.

Should Vada Pinson be in the Hall of Fame?

Definitely put him in! - 72.8%
Maybe, but others deserve it first. - 15.4%
Probably not, but it wouldn't be the end of the world. - 7.9%
No opinion. - 0.4%
No way! - 3.5%

64. Bobby Bonds

It seemed like Bobby Bonds was always in someone’s shadow.  As a kid breaking into the Giants, he shared an outfield with Willie Mays.  In his final years, he remained a talented pro but was relegated to journeyman status, bouncing around the league.  He is also Barry’s father.  We prefer to think of him as one of the early prototypes of the modern baseball athlete.

Bobby Bonds was one of the great leadoff men of all time.  He combined power and speed in ways that nobody had before, and in the 1973 season, he was a home run away from becoming the first ever 40/40 man in baseball history.  Bonds did the 30/30 five times in his career and displayed the kind of skills that would come to be expected of the next generation of baseball players.  He would lead his respective league in Power-Speed nine times and, as of this writing, is 5th all-time in that statistic.

Bonds did have negatives that would keep him from the Hall.  He did walk a lot, but his batting average was only .268.  Subsequently, Bonds struck out a lot, leading the league in that category three times.  He may not necessarily deserve enshrinement in Cooperstown, but he does deserve to be out of shadows.

Should Bobby Bonds be in the Hall of Fame?

Definitely put him in! - 61.8%
Maybe, but others deserve it first. - 16.4%
Probably not, but it wouldn't be the end of the world. - 11.8%
No opinion. - 0.9%
No way! - 9.1%