James Brooks led the league in All-Purpose yards in his first two years in the league. He excelled at Kick Returns and three times eclipsed the 1,000-yard mark rushing. He was not the biggest athlete, but he was one of the most elusive runners and was able to use his smaller stature as a positive as opposed to a negative.
Brooks was a great worker, but without an All-Pro Selection on his resume, the Hall likely considers him a really good player, but not necessarily a great one. Most NFL Running Backs wish that they could have a career that was as good as Brooks.
Should James Brooks be in the Hall of Fame?
Definitely put him in! - 65.9%
Maybe, but others deserve it first. - 15.9%
Probably not, but it wouldn't be the end of the world. - 14.6%
No opinion. - 1.2%
No way! - 2.4%
Comments powered by CComment