Fred McGriff did not reach 500 homers as he fell seven short, thus ending the aforementioned debate. The man dubbed the “Crime Dog” may have been a two time Home Run champion but he was not always considered among the upper echelon of power hitters. Perhaps it was because he played first base in a time of powerful first basemen (hence only five All Star appearances), or in the midst of the steroid era where he posted traditional Home Run figures at a time when freakish power numbers occurred. Regardless, McGriff was a very capable power hitter who was an asset to any lineup he played on.
Would his chances improve had he reached 500? It probably would. Likely what holds his chances back even further is that he was perceived as being too one dimensional. His fielding was average at best, and he was not going to win games with his speed. Despite a long career, he never played longer than five seasons with any team and thus lacked the set identity with any franchise. Statistically speaking, he does rank with other first basemen in the Hall, but he also does with a few left out. If McGriff had just one more intangible voters wouldn’t be on the fence with him like they are now.
Comments
It's the Al Kaline Syndrome: 399 HR, .297 BA, 498 doubles. Just shy of nice, even plateaus. Even if he'd not played his final season and not have reached 3000 hits, his Hall of Fame legacy was already written.
RSS feed for comments to this post