A+ A A-

1a. Vince McMahon

Rate this item
(1 Vote)

Vince McMahon

Do we have to explain this one?  Say what you want about Vince but NOBODY can ever dispute that Vince is the WWE.  When we get the feeling that Vince will step down from an active role, he will automatically vault to the top of our list.  Hell, we might put him there anyway.

Should they be in the Hall of Fame?

(You must be registered and logged in to vote!)
Definitely put them in! - 60%
Maybe, but others deserve it first. - 0%
Probably not, but it wouldn't be the end of the world. - 20%
No opinion. - 0%
No way! - 20%
Last modified on Friday, 08 November 2013 21:02

Comments   

 
-2 #1 Dale 2014-01-19 16:34
They will only put Vince McMahon Jr. in because they put his father in.
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Login

Click an icon to login instantly with your social account. (If you are logged into Facebook, clicking the Facebook icon will log you in to Not in Hall of Fame instantly.)

Search

  • 289. Col. DeBeers
    289. Col. DeBeers
    A journeyman wrestler in the eyes of many, Ed Wiskoski became a successful commodity in the industry when he adopted the gimmick of a South African mercenary.  Wiskoski played a “Polish Prince”, a “Maharaji” but once he decided he was an African racist in the American Wrestling Association, he struck gold in the last half of the 1980’s.   Wiskoski in…
    Add new comment

red gold blue

© 2009-2012 Kirk Buchner & David Johnson