Having a lot of fun doing our Baseball debates with two of my bloggers, DDT and the Phillies Archivist, I wanted to repeat the same idea with this year’s Football Finalists, but due to time constraints I will take a deeper look at each candidate myself and offer a few thoughts as to their Hall of Fame candidacy
Next, I take a look at former Head Coach, Don Coryell.
This is actually the easiest debate as the Hall of Fame case for Don Coryell always comes down to the same question: Innovation Vs Success.
Seriously, it is that simple.
Coryell was dubbed “Air Coryell” for a putting a higher premium on the passing game, and creating a unique rhythm forcing defenses to cover all parts of the field. Tight Ends, Running Backs would go in motion, Receivers had no set start point, and the ball would be going to the target before the receiver would get there. Coryell made deep routes a major part of his offense and altered the way Tight Ends were played, making them a bigger part of offensive targets. All of this is commonplace today but this was not happening before Coryell literally changed the way the game was played.
He would begin this revolution with the St. Louis Cardinals where he would win two consecutive division titles, but it was in San Diego where he had the Quarterback he wanted (Dan Fouts) that he was really able to bring his vision to light. His Chargers would win the division three times and would lead the National Football League in passing six consecutive seasons, which remains a record today.
That’s the positive side of the Hall of Fame ledger, which has been enough to keep him on the ballot for a few years now; here is the negative.
Coryell did take his teams to the playoffs often but only has a 3 and 6 record and does not have any Super Bowl rings, generally a prerequisite for a Hall of Fame induction. His regular season record is 111-83-1, which is decent, but is not spectacular.
However, the biggest and fairest criticism of Don Coryell was his lack of attention to defense, and even past Defensive Coordinators would state that he had limited interest in that side of the ball. That did show in the teams he coached, as they were routinely on the bottom half of points and yards allowed.
So there you have it. The ultimate case of innovation Vs Accomplishment.
Personally, I am all about innovation, though my glasses are tainted somewhat by looking at other Halls of Fame and how they induct players/musicians and when you are a game changer, I believe you should get in.
Will he this year?
Probably not.
Comments powered by CComment